|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 6th, 2007, 09:06 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 346
|
4:3 with the XH A1
I'm looking at a possible purchase of this camera but I also need to be able to shoot 4:3. Cropping in post is not an option as the 4:3 shoots are live broadcast.
I'm wondering if anyone has used this camera in this way. How good is the resolution? How might it compare to the DVX 100B? When shooting in this mode what does the view finder show? The full 16:9 image with indicators for where the 4:3 image is, or does it just show the 4:3 image? Thanks |
May 6th, 2007, 09:28 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 959
|
You have a choice of 4:3 or DV 16:9. Both reflect what's in the viewfinder & LCD
Bill |
May 6th, 2007, 10:05 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 477
|
I have used my XHA1 a lot in the 4:3 mode, and must say that it does quite well. No direct experience with a DVX to compare it to, but it's hard to imagine that the DVX would be much better. It easly beats (in some cases, lowest light an exception of course) /equals my Sony VX2100 that I use at work. It is well qualified for 4:3 SD work. Plus it does HDV.
|
May 6th, 2007, 10:42 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 157
|
I just shot something in 4:3 today and it looks fantastic. I think it looks better than the DVX.
|
May 6th, 2007, 10:49 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Espoo Finland
Posts: 380
|
Image is sharper than on DVX100, and you get almost twice the zoom. On the other hand you have to tweak the custom presets to get same colors (factory preset is bleak) and loose about 1 to 1.5 stops of low light sensitivity.
Get the Canon. |
May 7th, 2007, 12:43 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I think you can only shoot 4:3 in SD. HDV only will work in 16:9. So if you're shooting SD, you can do 4:3 fine.
The only real issue you'll notice from shooting 4:3 with a 16:9 chip camera is that your lens won't be as wide at the wide angle end of the zoom. The reason is that in 4:3 mode you'll be cropping off the sides of the chip's area just a bit (you don't do that, the camera does--what you see in the VF is what you get), so in effect you're shooting with slightly smaller chips, and the lens, therefore, will act like a longer lens. So you have more zoom in, but not as much zoom out. I've been dealing with this for several years shooting with a DSR500ws. My lens on that camera is an 8.5-127, but in 4:3 mode it acts about like a 10mm on the wide end. The nice thing about a 1/3" chip camera versus the 2/3" chip DSR500 is that if you need more width, you can get a reasonably priced wide angle adapter. For a 2/3" lens, the price is about $2500 for a decent adapter. |
May 8th, 2007, 09:41 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 73
|
With SD, you can shoot either 4:3 or 16:9, whereas HD is only 16:9. I've shot SD 4:3 on my A1 and had great results.
Don't forget to download and try out the custom presets (a sticky on this forum) and experiment to find the ones you like best, because, as others have said, the A1's colors out of the box are rather flat, but totally customizable to get all the vibrancy you'll ever need. |
May 11th, 2007, 09:21 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
I'd like to shoot in 16:9 HDV and import as SD 4:3 DV avi.
Any ideas? |
May 11th, 2007, 02:27 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, New Jersey
Posts: 249
|
|
May 11th, 2007, 02:36 PM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I shoot everything with the XH A1 as HDV, 16:9. I capture it that way in the FCP 1080P24 setting. If I want to use the footage in an SD 4:3 timeline, I just drop it into the timeline and enlarge and crop with Motion (the Motion tab, not the Send to Motion). It has to render but looks really good. I've done a similar thing with Avid, but getting to the same place is a little different. I'd assume any NLE could do the same.
|
May 11th, 2007, 03:23 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
that's what i've been doing in vegas...and it does look great.
what i'm looking for are some creative ideas on actually importing that 16:9 HDV footage AS 4:3 downconverted DV without the rigamoral. I've been playing around with the 4:3/16:9 out settings on the HV20 and then changing the pixles in Vegas but there are still black bars or it looks a bit stretched. i've been shooting HDV but framing for 4:3 SD. it just seems silly to actually film in SD with this cam. i guess i'm just wishing for a 4:3 downconvert option on the HV20! |
May 12th, 2007, 12:59 AM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Philly/NJ
Posts: 18
|
I'd definitely agree with eric wiess on it being the best way to tackle this situation. With the taping in HD, you at least have all that footage not SD on reserve so for making HD demo reels in the future you can have that footage ready.
|
May 12th, 2007, 10:51 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
So this seems to be the "fastest" method I could come up with.
Record 16:9 HDV Pop the tape into the HV20 - set TV type to 16:9 - DV output to DV Import as DV (Im using Vegas) The avi file should be a full widescreen avi ( 1.2121) Open a 4:3 timeline and pop it in. Event/Crop to "match output" aspect Edit away. It's not as big a drop in quality as you might think. Well... to people in this group it will be.. but not to your average SD viewer. |
May 12th, 2007, 11:29 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 306
|
Or you could shoot 1080i60 and playback on a sony with SD downconvert "crop" turned on....
|
May 20th, 2007, 08:19 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 346
|
I've been away so have only just checked back in. Thanks for all your replies.
What presets would anyone recommend to match with a PD150? |
| ||||||
|
|