|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 20th, 2007, 07:43 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
HDVSplit 0.77
New version of HDVsplit is out. It should support Canon A1.
http://strony.aster.pl/paviko/hdvsplit.htm
__________________
Michael |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2007, 01:02 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada!
Posts: 353
|
Michael you are AWESOME.
Me & all my weddings this summer will undoubtedly be extremely thank ful for this. Let me know if you accept any donations! I just tested this out with XH-A1 footage shot for a wedding yesterday and it works 100% perfect as it did when I used v.75 for my Sony HDV footage. |
|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2007, 10:13 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
Michael, I just contributed the link, the software itself is written by another fellow. But I am happy with it just like you.
__________________
Michael |
|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2007, 11:04 AM
|
#4 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beavercreek, OH
Posts: 93
|
Sorry for my ignorance, what is HDVsplit and what does it do?
Thanks, Bill in Ohio |
|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2007, 11:55 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 182
|
So I have noticed something really strange. When I capture a clip using HDVSplit, Vegas has a *much* tougher time previewing it than when I capture the same clip using Vegas 7.0d's HDV capture utility.
I have noticed that HDVsplit has a cleaner clip creation in that unlike Vegas it doesn't append a frame or two from the clip that follows. Does that have anything to do with it?
__________________
Cana Video Productions, LLC Manchester, NH |
|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2007, 02:29 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2007, 06:20 PM
|
#7 |
|
Still Motion
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,186
|
Why would you want to capture and convert the files? Why not just capture and edit right away? In other words, what is the advantage of going this route over simply importing the footage and working with it right away?
Patrick |
|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2007, 07:04 PM
|
#8 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
regarding vegas.. i'm having fantastic results with ConnectHD, importing both Cineform AVI and m2t files. i didn't really like the sony hdv capture. for sd it is the best.
I can edit m2t files pretty well on my machine provided I dont add too many layers or effects. The avi is a bit smoother. |
|
|
|
|
April 11th, 2007, 02:36 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
Run on a laptop you can connect via firewire and control cam from HDVsplit. Just check the preview box and you can see full screen preview, without capturing. |
|
|
|
|
|
April 11th, 2007, 06:52 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Though I've been using HDVsplit for quite a while this preview feature was news to me. It works great, in terms of definition I find the preview screen image much better than that using Canon Console software.
__________________
Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
