|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 18th, 2007, 01:53 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 41
|
Capture Quality of A1
Sorry if this seems innappropriate for this board, but, I've got Premiere Pro 2.0 and an A1.
Basically, I'm shooting in SD at the moment, and I'm wondering how to retain the highest possible image quality from camera to pc. Now, At the moment, it looks good, but it is nothing compared to plugging the camera into the TV and watching it on that. So, my question is; is quality loss inevitable in transfer? Or is my set-up affecting it, i.e is PP2.0 bad for capturing video (would somthing like Avid or Vegas capture in higher quality?) Or is it my firewire cable? Would a more expensive one make it better? Any advice would be much appreciated... Best all, Giles B |
March 18th, 2007, 02:15 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
Yes. Capture with Sony Vegas and the default NTSC DV codec. It is the best out there. You won't see any loss of quality from the source tape.
It's not the cable. How is the SD quality of the A1? That's what I'm trying to find out. |
March 19th, 2007, 04:09 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 162
|
If you shot the footage in SD, then the capture process to the PC simply copies the data from the tape to your PC. There is no recompression, and absolutely zero loss of quality, no matter whether you are using Vegas, Premiere or any other other editing program (as long as you stay in the DV format). By the same manner, the firewire cable dosn't make any difference.
Whatever perceived loss of quality you experience is likely due to the way your PC is displaying the image. Remember that the image in your editing window is only an approximation of the real image, really just a glorified thumbnail. If you look at the .AVI file in a something like Windows Media Player, you will get a better idea of the real quality of the footage. If you output the edited footage back to tape, then play the tape in your camcorder connected to a monitor, it will look exactly the same as the raw footage you viewed earlier. If you do want to view the final product regularly on your computer screen, you will likely have to tweak the brightness and colors a bit, as computer LCD screens will display video very differently from a television. Good luck and happy shooting! |
March 19th, 2007, 11:26 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 41
|
Ok good stuff, cheers for the info. So what happens if I shoot in HD? Is that captured by a different method?
|
March 19th, 2007, 12:19 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Different NLEs use different codecs, so things can vary.
|
March 19th, 2007, 12:22 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
C'mon, Bill - unless you want to use some special codec (eg. an intermediate AVI), a captured file is an exact, 1:1 copy of the original.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
March 19th, 2007, 05:49 PM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
I'm not a tech expert on this stuff, but my understanding is that during capture the unaltered DV data stream is "wrapped" in an AVI file format. I think (not sure) that most major NLEs now use the Microsoft DV codec for capture to ensure compatibility of the captured file, then in the case of PPro I think during edit it uses the MainConcept codec. Thereafter, playback, editing, and rendering for export may vary slightly in quality depending on the codec used to render the new, edited digital video stream. So there's little to be concerned about with capture, but for the purists, the subtle differences from one codec to another may become visible after complex editing and rendering...and each generation of rendering will reduce quality in any lossy codec (rounding errors and all that). FWIW, in the "old days" six or seven years ago when my state of the art PC had trouble doing miniDV, I used a Canopus Raptor card (and the Canopus DV codec) to capture and edit. Now I don't bother...firewire straight into PPro. I wouldn't consider myself a "purist" but it wouldn't take much of a quality issue for me to get a burr in my saddle and PPro 2 captures DV just fine.
For HDV, it'll be much the same. In the case of PPro, it natively captures the mpeg data stream and appends an *.mpg extension. No loss of quality until later in the process...transcoding, editing, compositing, rendering. That's where intermediate codecs come in; HDV is very highly compressed using GOP's and by once going to a good quality, less compressed intraframe AVI codec you can play digital magic with neglible loss with lots of filters, effects, and renders. That's kind of a layman's paraphrase, but Giles, don't worry about it. Capture the original footage, which will then always be available just as you shot it, and have fun editing!
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
March 20th, 2007, 12:12 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estes Park, CO USA
Posts: 426
|
If you're talking about viewing it thorugh PPro's preview window, check to make sure that your preview quality is at "high" setting, and not "draft" or "automatic". Also, your window size should be 100% to avoid any scaling artifacts/ fuzziness. Once you're assured of the quality, you can change it back to get the best realtime playback.
HTH, Brian Brown |
March 20th, 2007, 01:22 AM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|