|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 12th, 2007, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,487
|
GL1 vs XH A1 in SD
Has anyone compared the low light performance of a GL1 vs the XH A1 in SD mode?
My impressionis that they are about the same effective speed at 60i but I would like to hear from anyone who has shot both in SD.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
March 12th, 2007, 06:37 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: columbus, oh
Posts: 44
|
This is not scientific by any means...but the XH A1 fares much better in low light to my eyes (and monitor..lol). When boosting gain..the XH A1 appears to introduce less noise
|
March 14th, 2007, 05:23 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 89
|
I agree with John. Got both cams (PAL-Versions) and compared them side by side on a monitor. Low light performance of the XH A1 is much better.
Nevertheless you have to tweak the settings of the (at least: my) XH to get really good results in SD, especially regarding sharpness and coring. |
April 3rd, 2007, 04:49 AM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,487
|
A quick test with my A1 in SD mode vs GL1.
Based of Photoshop analysis of frame grabs from Premiere Out of the box tests/settings (not adjusted for optimum noise, etc.) In poor light (~60 watt bare bulb 24 feet from Macbeth color chart), that corresponds to an exposure of 1 second at f2 with ISO 320 film. Manual mode, 1/60 shutter, adjusting gain and shutter For same luma, A1 is maybe 1/2 stop faster. Noise level about the same at 12 dB gain. A1 image is noticeably sharper. Color balance is close but you can see a difference.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
| ||||||
|
|