|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 28th, 2007, 12:55 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 157
|
Canon FS-72U filters
I was wondering if anyone knows anything about the canon FS-72U filter set ($114). I could find little information on the canon site or elsewhere. Basically its a set of three filters, an ND8, polarizing, and UV filter. Is the quality of the glass suitable for the A1, do they have anti-flare coating? Does anyone have any recomendations for higher quality filters w/ 72mm threads? Do you guys think these are up to par with canons pro L series glass? They advertise them as accessories to the A1 on their site but don't really give any information about them.
|
April 23rd, 2007, 08:39 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 55
|
Can anyone comment on these FS-72U filters?
And btw, B&H currently has this for $49. |
April 23rd, 2007, 10:11 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 163
|
I was looking into filters for the XH-A1 and came across those. I was curious to know how well they worked.
|
April 23rd, 2007, 11:38 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 49
|
Canon doesn't make the filters themselves. They are cheap filters with a Canon sticker on the box. Easy money from people who don't know better.
I suggest buying multicoated Hoya/B+W. I'm unsure about the rules on this forum (linking non-sponsor sites) and don't want to mess up on my first post... -but there is a certain reputable Hong Kong based website that sells B+W and Hoya at very reasonable prices. For example a B+W 72mm MRC UV 010 Filter NEW F-PRO Multi-Coated Alloy is just $36. Multicoated, brass ring, easy to clean etc. |
April 24th, 2007, 02:46 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 100
|
There seems to be a lot of choice out there when it comes to filters. I purchased the new Hoya Pro1 Digital filters for my XH_A1. They are marked 'digital multicoated', supposedly 'designed exclusively for digital cameras' - & hence cost more. Importantly they are low profile and I found that I could use a polarizer over the top of the UV filter with no vignetting at wide. Normally you would have to remove the UV to use the PL, which can be a bit tricky in the field.
|
April 24th, 2007, 08:05 AM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 425
|
Quote:
__________________
Steam Age Pictures - videos in aid of railway preservation societies. |
|
April 24th, 2007, 11:35 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
|
April 24th, 2007, 01:40 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 500
|
They're actually pretty good. No degradation of the image as far as I can see. I've had considerably worse filters from some of the more well-known names!
__________________
Alex |
April 24th, 2007, 11:33 PM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
Is this reason enough not to use them? More in-depth comparison A standard Tiffen UV let's approximately 92-94% light pass through, a Hoya HMC 97%, and Hoya S-HMC 99.7%. Add flaring, ghosting and lower contrast. The A1 is fitted with some pretty nice glass. No point in degrading it to save $15. |
|
| ||||||
|
|