|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 19th, 2006, 12:20 AM
|
#16 |
|
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
I don't know what the real deal is with this 5 Free Sony Tapes offer, so I deleted the link. I've heard mixed reports about it, so I guess further investigation is due. Sorry for the (potential) spreading of a bad link.
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 12:24 AM
|
#17 | |
|
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 12:28 AM
|
#18 | |
|
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:20 AM
|
#19 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 391
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:26 AM
|
#20 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
FWIW, the literature for the Panasonic AQM tape imples is has:
1. significantlyimproved head wear and anti-clogging characteristics compared to their "previous tape" and 2. less drop out thatn ther "previous tape" and "other brand" While not stated, "othr brand" is likely Sony, but not clear which variation of Sony or theri own "previous tape" Has anyone seen any objective test data published by a third party recently?
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 09:20 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
Please see page 147 of your owners manual!
__________________
Chapter one, line one. The BH. |
|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 09:48 AM
|
#22 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, New Jersey
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
