XH-A1 chromatic aberration..blue meanies? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon HDV and DV Camera Systems > Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders
Canon XH G1S / G1 (with SDI), Canon XH A1S / A1 (without SDI).

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 8th, 2006, 10:40 AM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
XH-A1 chromatic aberration..blue meanies?

I had posted some footy from the Brevis35 and the A1 yesterday, and there were some nasty chromatic issues in part of the clip. I did a quick test with the camera and found that CA shooting with a wide open aperture was not good. However, it disappeared as I stopped down to f4.8.

I was using the CINE. V preset, with NR on low, and gain at -3db, and I have not tested to see if these settings play into things. It is something we'll have to be aware of when shooting with the A1.

Here's the clip.
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 10:45 AM   #2
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 451
Doesn't look remotely like CA.

There are plenty of other causes of colour fringing caused, for example, by overdriving CCDs.

TT
Tony Tremble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 10:51 AM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
Tony, there is a blue halo to the left of the entire plant stalk at f 2.4. I may be incorrect in calling this chromatic aberration, usually it's magenta, (I'm not Adam Wilt :-) but if it's not CA, what is it? I was thinking blue fringing from HDV, but it disappears as the lens is stopped..perhaps a contrast induced artifact?
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 11:04 AM   #4
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 451
It is probably CCD blooming. Excess charge is spilling over into adjacent pixels around an area of extreme contrast.

It shouldn't be a problem as you were seriously over exposing the scene to get the effect.

TT
Tony Tremble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 11:25 AM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
It would be very cool if that is all it is...either way, I'll be a lot more carefull with exposure shooting adapter footage. I'll have to look at what IRE levels this shows up at and adjust the zebras to match. Either that, or invest in a decent HD on-cam monitor. It definitely is worse when the plant stock is at the edge of the frame, and better when the stalk is at frame center. From that perspective, it behaves just like CA.

With respect to the adapter footage, the left side of the man's head is not at 100 IRE, but definitely at the edge of the frame. The blue halo was not there as I panned (not in the clip) but does increase as his head approached the edge of the frame. In other words..with head at center frame, no blue halo...with head at edge of frame..huge one. This is exactly what I'm seeing with the bare cam footage at f2.4.
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 11:57 AM   #6
Obstreperous Rex
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 27,368
Images: 513
Not all fringing is chromatic aberration. As has been extensively discussed previously in our XL H1 forum, CA is only one of many potential causes.
__________________
CH

Search DV Info Net | 20 years of DVi | ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!
Chris Hurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 01:52 PM   #7
Barry Wan Kenobi
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Wood
In other words..with head at center frame, no blue halo...with head at edge of frame..huge one. This is exactly what I'm seeing with the bare cam footage at f2.4.
If it's the exact same exposure and everything, but in the center of the lens it's clean and at the edges it's fringing, then yes that would be some optical issue such as chromatic aberration. I've also noticed a distinct red/green separation on extreme wide shots that looks almost like a prism error, but just may be an extreme case of chromatic separation. Always on the edges of the frame, never in the center.

But yes, as Chris and Tony said, there are many causes of fringing, not all are due to lens error, many times it can be simply overdriving the green CCD but the blue and red CCDs are still delivering signal, which shifts that section of the image to become purple. The way to tell if it's the lens or if it's exposure or whatnot is to see if it happens elsewhere in the frame, as you tried. If it is consistent throughout the frame it's not likely a lens issue; if it only happens on the edges then it's definitely a lens issue.
Barry Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 02:14 PM   #8
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
Yes, check out this clip as I pan. It's definitely worse at the frame edge...and that's why I was thinking along the lines of a chromatic issue.

I can reproduce this exactly with the bare cam ... and it disappears completely as I close down a few stops. I should stress that I have not tested this without NR (set to LOW) or anything but -3db gain and the camera is set to CINE. V for a preset (tweaked as above).

Agreed on the fringing issue Chris. Red fringing, for example, in the world of DV is all about the codec. From what I've read, chromatic abberration is not typically blue either. To be honest, I'm not overly concerned about this. If it is something common to the cam, it's just a matter of paying attention and shooting accordingly. Ever cam seems to have its idiosyncrasies, if indeed that's what we're see here. If it canned be tuned out by turning down sharpening etc, great.
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 02:49 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Wood
Every cam seems to have its idiosyncrasies, if indeed that's what we're see here.
A well-said point. I have yet to see a camera that did NOT have some idiosyncrasy, including film cameras.
Bill Pryor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 04:25 PM   #10
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 204
Are you sure you don't have some setting wrong or it is an error in your specific model? Not saying it's impossible that all a1's have this but i haven't seen it in any other footage, take for example rafaels footage where he is sitting in front of a glass door, no blue halos...
Also, did it matter what opening the lens in front of the brevis was on, or was it just the a1 lens?
Steven Fokkinga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 04:32 PM   #11
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
If I could reproduce the adapter shot exactly, I would. All I'm testing now is the bare cam as I need to understand what conditions, f/stops, presets etc either contribute, or ameliorate the fringing. It is possible it's just this camera, hopefully not.

Because the prototype diffuser is not set up properly, I had assumed it was this that was causing the problem. I was a bit surprised to try that test today and see the fringe on the bare cam. That test is typical of what I would try testing the adapter to evaluate CA.
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 06:48 PM   #12
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 157
If you are using NR one on low you WILL see some form of ghosting. Try NR2 on LOW, its effect on Noise is much less but 0 ghosting.

I have shot a lot of footage on NR1 and NR2. NR1 probably isnt something you want to use.
Noel Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8th, 2006, 07:05 PM   #13
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
Thanks for that tip Noel. I was thinking NR would be the first thing to try, given my tweaks to the CINE. V. preset. I'll try the same test tomorrow with/without NR1 and 2. I've got issues with noise, but I'd rather see that over the blue halo :-)
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6th, 2007, 09:49 AM   #14
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
I thought it fair to the A1 to summarize a few things I've discovered since shooting this footage.

1. I don't believe NR had anything to do with the blue fringing. In fact, with a fairly static subject, NR1 or 2 even on high, would have been fine in this clip.

2. The A1, does show some CA, with wide open aperture, at full wide, in limited conditions. However, reducing exposure, zooming in, or stopping down to f2.8 when at full wide eliminates it. This was shown in my own subsequent tests with the bare cam. No show stopper there.

3. One of the test grabs from the m2/sgpro/brevis test by Phil Bloom showed what appears to be CA from the SGpro that was not there with the other adapters. However, a Canon FD 50mm f1.4 was used on the Sgpro ... the same lens I used in this A1 clip. Recognize the blue meanie? http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/attachmen...1&d=1170214446

So although the A1 does show chromatic issues under limited conditions, there is evidence to suggest the blue fringing problem was coming from the Canon 50mm f1.4 lens being used on the adapter.
Dennis Wood is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon HDV and DV Camera Systems > Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network