|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 27th, 2006, 03:02 AM | #46 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
I'm not saying that the autofocus should be inactive whilst zooming. What we're talking about here is an focus "aretifact" that occurs when zooming on static objects. Quote:
2. You're absolutely right, I barely EVER have the AF on - and we've all been taught that we shouldn't really be zooming in-vision (the human eye doesn't zoom). My point is more to do with merchantable quality of goods. If Canon advertises a feature, then that feature should be usable. It is reasonable to expect that AF could be left on, as zooming in and out is normal behaviour whilst filming something. AF cannot be left on during very slow zooms on the long end of the lens, because it produces an unpleasant effect on screen. It's like advertising a car that has self-leveling suspension, but not mentioning that you can't drive it up hills.
__________________
Alex |
||
December 27th, 2006, 03:29 AM | #47 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Quote:
I guess we all can live with this AF malfunction during slow zooms. But I completely agree with Alex that this pulsing is NOT what one would accept of any AF system - alll the less since Canon praises its design as new and revolutionary. The AF system of my former FX1 didn't pulse at all during slow zooms, so it never ruined a zoom shot like my new A1 does in AF. Chris, as soon as you find the time please change the title of this thread, since the problem is NOT solved. The actual title is misleading for users - and for Canon, when they browse through user feedbacks to get input for a coming firmware update.
__________________
Michael Last edited by Michael Mann; December 27th, 2006 at 03:59 AM. |
||
December 27th, 2006, 06:05 AM | #48 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Snellville, Georgia
Posts: 614
|
Quote:
Now having said that, let me clarify that I perceive this phenomena at 24F and don't plan to shoot weddings at that frame rate. I'd shoot a typical wedding at 60i unless requested otherwise, and I have not noted the pulsing zoom at 60i so I'm not concerned. However, since the pulsing focus is possibly related to the AF sampling rate, I could see this being an issue for PAL users under more typical shooting scenarios as opposed to NTSC users.
__________________
www.philipwilliams.com |
|
December 27th, 2006, 06:14 AM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
|
Alex his camera was faulty and is replaced, he did not have the going in - out focus problems anymore. Canon fixed that matter. That you see minimal pulsing on the big screen while doing zoom in with AF on, is something you can avoid.
Michael: there are many very happy A1 shooters at work on the moment I did not hear anyone complaining like you do. You complain about everything. Can you try to shake the camera hard (what you did before) while zooming with AF on at the same moment, and describe what is happening? If you can't see it on monitor, try a 42" screen, please report your findings. |
December 27th, 2006, 06:21 AM | #50 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
Is done many times, professional lenses don't have autofocus, but have autozoom. Canon gave us the 3 ring lens, use it. |
|
December 27th, 2006, 06:37 AM | #51 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
I think that Canon was so happy with the 'speedy AF two way instant focus system' that the marketing department only told you the goodies.. But I remember the Panasonic HVX200 without saying what the real CCD resolution was... |
|
December 27th, 2006, 11:12 AM | #52 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Therefore my intention is not to complain but to observe and to share. Period. And if there are weak points - I don't want to draw the curtain over them. Quote:
__________________
Michael Last edited by Michael Mann; December 27th, 2006 at 12:39 PM. |
||
December 28th, 2006, 09:07 AM | #53 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
Informed Canon about focus pulsing problem
Meanwhile I had a phone call with Canon Service in Germany.
The service member promised to watch the demonstration clips (http://www.filefactory.com/f/f5656740836b15ad/) to unterstand the problem. And he promised to call me back as soon as possible. I will keep you informed ...
__________________
Michael |
December 28th, 2006, 09:16 AM | #54 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 500
|
Thank you Michael. I look forward to hearing what Canon have to say about this issue.
__________________
Alex |
December 29th, 2006, 03:47 AM | #55 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kelkheim, Germany
Posts: 375
|
Received a phone call by Canon
I just received a phone call (conference call) by a Canon Service team in Germany:
(1) They had watched the two demo clips and they DID notice the focus pulsing problem. They asked me about further technical details (distance to object, f-stop). (2) Their first guess was that the two clips show EXTREME lighting situations: low contrast boy in front of low contrast tapestry; low lit woman in front of bright background lighting. (I agreed but replied that the problem occurs under NORMAL lighting/contrast situations just the same.) (3) Their second guess was that the problem might occur in long telephoto focal lengths and/or open iris zoom shots only. (I replied that more or less depth of field sure makes this problem less or more visible, but the pulsing DOES NOT DISAPPEAR in medium focal length and/or medium f-stop zoom shots.) (4) Their final guess was that this AF pulsing is NOT FIXABLE - not even via firmware update - but probably is related to the design of the AF system. (I put into perspective that there ARE cams on the market that do not show this problem, e.g. the FX1.) (5) The Service team promised to forward the information to Japan. Chris, could you please change the title of this thread, since it may mislead fellow users as well as Canon when browsing through this forum. The problem remains NOT SOLVED. Thank you.
__________________
Michael Last edited by Michael Mann; December 29th, 2006 at 10:41 AM. |
December 30th, 2006, 10:32 AM | #56 |
Tourist
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hungary
Posts: 4
|
I have exactly the same focus problem with my A1 (PAL). There is only one solution: disable AF and use manual focus. I would be also happy if Canon could fix it.
Nevertheless, the camera is really professional... |
December 30th, 2006, 10:43 AM | #57 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 500
|
Thanks Michael for your report. I suspect current owners are not likely to see a fix, so as Gabor says, the only workaround for this "quirk" is to keep AF off.
In almost every other respect this is a great camera.
__________________
Alex |
December 30th, 2006, 11:23 AM | #58 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
Shooting low contrast subjects at long focal lengths it seems you lacked proof and were not convincing to the Canon Service team that this is a serious problem. Nothing is more irritating than when someone with a problem gets replies from others who say "mine doesn't do that!" And while I don't dismiss the seriousness of the problem for you, for me it's not happening at all. So while I have no idea how many cams are affected, I know that not all of them are. But if I felt as strongly about it as you do, I would return or sell the A1 and go back to the Z1. But no regrets here. The A1 picture quality and control is superior, even given some of the other limitations like the smaller LCD screen or lack of an OIS button. The eyes have it. |
|
December 30th, 2006, 01:07 PM | #59 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 500
|
Thanks Tom for your input.
Just to be clear, you're saying that your A1 does NOT show any symptoms of focus "pulsing" at long focal lengths in AF mode (in 24F or 30F)? Makes me feel a little miffed that I've managed to get two units in a row that DO show this problem. Still like you say, the picture quality is so much better than my FX1, and I leave AF on so infrequently that in lieu of any response from Canon, I'm happy to live with the quirk.
__________________
Alex |
December 30th, 2006, 01:36 PM | #60 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
I will try 24F and 30F shortly and report my observation here. |
|
| ||||||
|
|