|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 7th, 2006, 11:44 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 140
|
What about ergonomics?
I'd like to hear what those who have the camera find about it's ergonomics... how it feels on your hands...how easy is it to shoot handheld...and how it compares to the DVX and the FX1/Z1.
Thank you all! |
November 7th, 2006, 11:45 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coalville America
Posts: 244
|
Also how good is the zoom rocker? is it sensitive, stiff or just right?
How good is battery life, if anyone has used it for a day shot yet? |
November 7th, 2006, 11:51 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 1,771
|
Just a quick note....I found the rocker to be not sensitive enough. I could barely pull off a slow creep zoom in or out. It just seemd too jumpy... Compared to my H1 that is.
|
November 7th, 2006, 12:28 PM | #4 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Set the zoom speed switch from "var" (variable) to "con" (constant), dial in a zoom speed value of 1 or 2 on the zoom speed dial behind the rocker, and get a slow, creeping zoom no matter how hard you press on the zoom rocker.
|
November 7th, 2006, 01:08 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 306
|
Compared to the Sony Z1U, the Canon XHA1 is nearly the same ergonomics. When you pick up the Canon, the grip does not feel as nice as the Sony, but after shooting for a couple of hours, they're about equally uncomfortable. The Canon balance makes it tilt to the left a little more, but it's not bad.
Shooting handheld, though, the Canon wins hands-down. The image stabilizer in the Canon is miles better. The Sony viewfinder and LCD are much better than the Canon, though. No clear winner here, just personal preference. Chuck Quote:
|
|
November 7th, 2006, 03:04 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 161
|
I agree with Chuck. XH A1 offers similar ergonomics to other cams of this size.
Focus, zoom and iris rings have very nice feel. One more plus for Canon is internal battery compartment. That's one great idea imo. It will keep battery and cam warmer in cold weather and away from your nose. It's really worth extra 1 second it takes to remove or insert battery. |
November 7th, 2006, 03:49 PM | #7 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 1,771
|
Quote:
I am aware of that feature. Simply put, my limited experience with the A1 has me thinking the rocker on the H1 is a little better. I have never used the constant option on the H1. I never had to. The feel of the H1 variable let me access all of the zoom speeds with relative ease. I found the A1 would suddenly accelerate although I felt as though I had not applied any more pressure. It may just take some getting used to. |
|
November 7th, 2006, 04:05 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Chuck--you said the stabilization is better than the Z1? I thought the Z1 was the best I'd seen, so I'm very interested in seeing the A1 in person.
|
November 7th, 2006, 04:51 PM | #9 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
See the operator's manual, pages 83 and 87. |
|
November 7th, 2006, 06:11 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
I agree with Chuck and Marty. The image stabilization with only 1 setting is better than my Z1U that had 3 settings.
But the zoom rocker on the A1 is not as good, not as controllable and flimsy. For that reason as Chris suggested, I just have it set on the constant position setpoint #3, and use the zoom ring with my thumb from underneath until I'm almost out of reach with the thumb, cross over to the zoom rocker while I reposition the thumb. The zoom ring with thumb control is nice for tracking a moving object, like my dog going in circles. Overall the ergos are similar. Because the Sony has the tape mechanism on the left side, they can put a little more contour into the right side hand grip. The A1 is heavier. The LCD is hugely better on the Sony, the viewfinder I think on the Canon is better by a small margin. Though I'm getting sharp images out of the A1, I still haven't found the secret to the saturated colors of the Sony, the Canon is pale in comparison. |
November 7th, 2006, 06:13 PM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
Posts: 1,418
|
I've owned both the DVX100A and FX-1 and the Canon is a tad bit smaller and more rounded. I never liked the length of the FX-1 as I found it just too long but I did like the form factor and handling of the DVX's. I do like the ergos of the Canon better but if it were a tad bit smaller like the JVC HD10u or GRD1 it'd be perfect! Of course ergos are something "personal" and every user has different likes and hand size so each user will find handling different- it's a matter of personal taste and is subjective- but I do personally score the A1 high on my "likes" list!
Try to handle one personally before committing if possible. |
November 7th, 2006, 06:14 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
Posts: 1,418
|
On a side note- is everyones mic a bit loose or bouncy? My mic moves up and down a slight bit and just seems generally loose- anyone notice this? Can this be tightened?
|
November 7th, 2006, 06:27 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
You're joking about the bouncing mic right? I've been asking questions about that since day 1, even started a thread about it. I'm relieved, misery loves company.
|
November 7th, 2006, 06:33 PM | #14 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 1,771
|
Quote:
|
|
November 7th, 2006, 06:37 PM | #15 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
Posts: 1,418
|
Tom, well I guess it was in the design- it looks like it might have been done purposely to reduce shock- but who knows?
If others have this same "looseness" then perhaps it's 100% normal. (We could always put a slice of paper in the gap to tighten it up??) |
| ||||||
|
|