|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 3rd, 2006, 12:29 AM | #46 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
November 3rd, 2006, 12:31 AM | #47 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
Thankfully there's very little else to find fault with. |
|
November 3rd, 2006, 12:44 AM | #48 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 516
|
matthew, the minimum focal distance of the lens doesn't seem to be an issue with the m2. i used to have my xl2 crammed up against the m2 with the 16x IS lens to get it as close to the m2's ground glass as possible. the a1 does need a little bit of space however, but the rubber lip on the m2 proves to be more than enough to cover that issue. also, the shim looks to be a couple of mm off between the xl2 and a1... a re-shim of the m2 is probably in order.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 12:47 AM | #49 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 516
|
regarding the wb switch, i find marty's solution to be pretty elegant -- keep the lcd up, but rotated in towards the camera. the lcd is kept off, and you have access to the switch...
|
November 3rd, 2006, 01:21 AM | #50 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 195
|
For Adobe Premiere 2.0 users, here is the patch that you need in order to do 24f and 30f.
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloa...jsp?ftpID=3408 |
November 3rd, 2006, 02:48 AM | #51 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 516
|
i just finished making the appropriate changes to my m2 setup, and everything seems to be working lovely. once the appropriate shim height is set, the minimum focal distance is a complete non issue. i used the 1/16" shim (the thinnest one in the kit) which aligned the a1 nicely on the vertical axis, and then i was able to push the achromat right up against the m2 and the ground glass was in perfect focus.
here's an image of the setup. http://www.enjoyuserexperience.com/images/a1_m2.jpg |
November 3rd, 2006, 03:34 AM | #52 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 209
|
Hey Henry, seeing as how you have your M2 setup, any sign of an LCD flip at all? Seems like this question keeps coming up, but no one has an answer.
__________________
Stefan Scherperel SSE Productions http://www.stefweb.net |
November 3rd, 2006, 03:43 AM | #53 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 516
|
stefan... i can say, almost definitively, there is no image flip, unless canon put some undocumented easter egg somewhere in their custom functions menu, which is highly doubtful. it's unfortunate as the camera's form factor seems an ideal match for the m2. let's hope for a future update.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 03:46 AM | #54 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 209
|
WEll, that's unfortunate, and seems extremely odd for Canon to leave out, seeing as how the H1 has it, and the A1 is so extremely customizable. Any chance that a magnet will work? :)
__________________
Stefan Scherperel SSE Productions http://www.stefweb.net |
November 3rd, 2006, 03:57 AM | #55 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 516
|
even if it were possible, i've always been wary of sticking a magnet on the camera, especially a camera i like :). if i recall correctly, a few people messed up their cameras this way. the best portable solution IMHO is to get a small preview monitor with image flip. if the hd monitors are out of your budget, the cheaper 16:9 sd lcds like xenarc, varizoom, etc. should be fine for framing purposes.
|
November 3rd, 2006, 04:02 AM | #56 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 209
|
Actually I allready use an LCD, mounted upside down on my DVX, but I use the magnet as well on the LCD. To me this is still an inconvinience, as there are times when I don't want to use a larger LCD on the camera. I've been using the magnet on the DVX for about 9 months, never had a problem, I think it's important to use a magnet that is strong enough to flip the monitor, but not do any damage. I have even stuck the magnet to other parts of the DVX when I'm not using it, and have never had any problems. Well, hopefully canon will release some kind of update, while it's not really a deal breaker it is a major inconvinience.
__________________
Stefan Scherperel SSE Productions http://www.stefweb.net |
November 3rd, 2006, 05:59 AM | #57 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 917
|
Hey Henry...PHEW! was terrified cause plan to use it exclusivly with the M2!
Anyway, I just finally got my XL2 hardmounted (YES!). Think the hardmount should work with this cam then? Matt |
November 3rd, 2006, 07:16 AM | #58 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
November 3rd, 2006, 08:32 AM | #59 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Good info on the customizing buttons, Chris. I don't really see the misplacement of those switches as a big deal because I don't generally flip back and forth between daylight and tungsten much. But it's nice to know you can, in effect, put them where you want them if you so desire. That kind of customization is very cool.
A question about the M2 adapter photo...does that cover up the fast auto focus sensor? Also, I'm wondering if anybody has yet checked out the regular through-the-lens focusing at 24F. I know on the XL2, the auto focus button is borderline useless when shooting 24F but OK in 60i. |
November 3rd, 2006, 09:20 AM | #60 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 161
|
Bill -
Like with any 35mm adapter, you need to disable AF in the camera so the location of Fast AF sensor won't matter in that case. Same applies to image stabilizer. The camera has to keep hard steady focus on the screen inside the adapter. I agree about daylight/tungsten switch. It's not a problem with custom WB settings available so easily. Henry - thank you for testing the cam with M2. It's good news it works. As far as LCD flip is concerned, I hope the magnet trick works. As long as one uses small piece, it shouldn't cause any damage to the cam, maybe some scratches only. |
| ||||||
|
|