|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 23rd, 2009, 12:23 PM | #31 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 425
|
Quote:
The "black" level adjusts the way the camera responds to the darkest parts of the image. "Press" makes the dark bits darker while "stretch" makes them a little lighter. In poor light, black stretch can help to reveal details in shadows. However, if you are also using gain, then it can make the noise more noticable, since it's the dark parts of the image where gain is amplifying the lowest signal. HTH.
__________________
Steam Age Pictures - videos in aid of railway preservation societies. |
|
February 23rd, 2009, 10:22 PM | #32 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia, pa
Posts: 705
|
Thanks Mark.
|
February 24th, 2009, 09:16 AM | #33 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
Definitely a need for exclamation Mark, not sure where your head is but learning exposure is "getting to know your camera", that goes without saying and is the difference between so-so captures and quality images. By learning exposure you will learn how to set shutter, aperture, and other settings needed to properly expose based on the conditions you are shooting in, thereby getting to know your camera. At no time did I imply to "only ever use manual mode as you referred to above, I did however say that learning exposure was crucial. I often times shoot in TV, AV, but prefer Manual when I desire a certain result that the camera just can not determine on it's own. But at no time will I shoot in Auto or Easy. As for the cell phone camera? Surely you do not think that a 2 or 4 plus mega pixel phone cam is suitable for quality captures such as a childs first steps or fast moving wildlife at a distance do you? "Honey look, he's walking... grab the cell phone" C'mon...I mean really? They are so-so at best as far as the cell phone images I have seen thus far. I guess it boils down to a persons definition of quality huh Mark? As for your mention of studio and sets? Retakes and the like? If you have a look at my site you will see the conditions I shoot in. It is about as non-controlled as it gets. All my images are 100 % wild, no Zoos or controlled enviroments. I have no problems setting up my gear and getting the images I am after before they have passed, and then some, using what you refer to as a "proper camera in full manual mode". I would never dream of depending on my camera to determine a proper exposure as the conditions are constantly changing by the second. Nor would I rely on a cell phone to capture anything of quality. To even imply that a cell cam can capture something of quality or detail, something such as the eye of a bird in flight for example is rediculous. While I forewarned of my possible harsness, I make no appologies for my opinions based on facts and learning experiences so if the harsness offends you, well....it is what it is. In closing I will add...I hear the cell phone ring all day while out shooting but it never gets picked up even for it's intended use, to communicate, let alone to capture images.
__________________
www.socalt.com |
|
February 24th, 2009, 12:08 PM | #34 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
Many thanks for the explanation. Very helpful and clear. Richard
__________________
http://www.gooderick.com |
|
March 3rd, 2009, 10:06 AM | #35 | |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: san diego, CA
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Hey Mark - now that's the kind of explanation I like. Simple layman's terms. "makes the dark bits darker" :-) Thanks for that. Now, can anyone out there either give real world explanations for the other 22 adjustable recording specs in the Custom Preset section of the A1, OR point me to where I may find them? I've been looking all over this forum, and elsewhere on the net, and Mark's post in this thread is the only thing like that I've found. Generally, I'd like to know what those do, and the best Canon comes up with isn't so good. For instance, Canon says that PED brightens or darkens the dark areas, while SET brightens or darkens the shadow areas. WHAT is the difference? Also, what is Horizontal Detail Frequency (HDF) - the frequency (how often it occurs) of Horizontal Detail? More questions abound. I don't get it. Any Settings for Dummies out there? Specifically, here's my immediate concern. I'm picking up a DP job on a project from another DP (multiple shoot documentary). He shot the first shoot with a rented A1, and it looks great. Rich colors, black blacks, no noise/grain - solid work. Then, the director bought an A1, shot the 2nd shoot, and the colors are dull, slightly washed out, blah, drab. The rental house claims to reset ALL ALL ALL settings to manufacturer settings between rentals. The former DP says he never messes with any of the GAM, KNE, PED, SET, etc. settings, and that he doesn't even know how, really. The director says same thing. SO, why do the 2 sets of footage look so different? If the answer is that DP got exposures right and director didn't, I might believe that - but then I took the 2nd camera (owned by director) out, myself, and shot 2 days of b-roll and testing (I left camera on manufacturers settings), and still the same drab dull coloring (and, yeah, I know how to nail my exposures ;-) ). Anybody got any idears on what I can do to try to match the rich coloring of original DP? THANKS. by the way, we're shooting 10801p24 HDV. |
|
| ||||||
|
|