|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 21st, 2009, 02:57 AM | #16 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Quote:
tom. |
|
January 21st, 2009, 03:14 AM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 643
|
Quote:
|
|
January 21st, 2009, 03:27 AM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Your theory would indeed make sense Randy, but as I say I'm going on all the Mod and Pop Photographty tests done on these primes over the years. Also remember that most of the manufacturers do two lens lines, and if the posher f/1.4 is is twice the price of the f/1.8 used to 'sell the bodies' then they're not really comparable.
But c'mon guys - we're talking about strapping one of these babies to the front of a spinning, scratched screen - and photographing the result through a 20x zoom that cost very little considering its specification. All will be well. tom. |
January 21st, 2009, 05:34 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 643
|
Point taken and agreed.
|
| ||||||
|
|