|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 24th, 2008, 02:46 PM | #46 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Carol Stream, IL
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
__________________
Bob T. |
|
November 24th, 2008, 02:50 PM | #47 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 991
|
|
November 24th, 2008, 02:56 PM | #48 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
See http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/digital-v...order-ibc.html for everything we know so far.
|
December 9th, 2008, 10:46 AM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 69
|
Price
Chris (Hurd),
I think you are a little off in that the price in the U.S. is the same for the A1 and the A1s. I bought my A1 from B&H for $3,300. That was in September. Other less reputable outlets had it for $3,000 or less in some cases. Last time I checked, the new A1s was $3,999 from B&H. This represents about a 30% increase in cost – a substantial amount. And now that the A1s is shipping, the A1 is still in stock some places and is on supersale for $3,000 or less. Just wanted to clear that up. There is a significant price difference between the two, even in the U.S. Yes, you do get substantial improvements on the A1s, but you also pay for them. But I think this is more of a case of Canon realized what a great camera they have on their hands and wanted to jack up the profit margins a bit. |
December 11th, 2008, 09:26 AM | #50 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 345
|
B&H told me that they are going to be selling them for right at $4K. I can get a A1 one now for $29xx.xx. (with several toss in's"
I am very confused on what I should do. Should I wait for the new A1S or should I get a good deal on the A1. This is strictly a hobby for me right now and currently love my XL2. But I want HD and my wife wants something smaller for obvious reasons. Do you know if the Footage quality, Low light abilities or "Auto" Functions will be better on the A1S? I don't use "Auto" much. But in some cases if I am shooting something at Dusk under the lights. (Like a football game) and Auto White balance would be nice. (If it is good). Also the Auto Focus. There are times when I can't go manual and I find the XL2 lacks in the Auto Focus stand point. |
December 11th, 2008, 09:50 AM | #51 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I'm not off. I said that the price of the new A1S is the same price as the A1 was when it was *originally introduced,* and that's a fact which is easy to verify. I did not say that the new A1S price is the same as the *current* price of the older A1 -- there is of course a significant gap there. All I said was that the *introductory* prices of both cameras are the same. In other words, the A1S price is no higher than the A1 price was back in 2006 when it was first introduced.
|
December 11th, 2008, 10:18 AM | #52 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
If it's strictly a hobby, I would buy the much cheaper xh-a1. the A1s is really not "that" much better to justify the high price difference. With what you save you can get an external mic or videolight or whatever, in that case it's a better investment.
The improvements on the new model are ofcourse making it a better camera to controll but in Europe price differences are up to 1500 euro now between the 2 models and it might get a bit less noise but I doubt the image quality will be different. |
December 11th, 2008, 12:54 PM | #53 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 656
|
Quote:
A used A1 in the future is not going to sell as well as a used A1s. However, a new A1 at about $2,500 would be a steal. May not happen though.
__________________
Panasonic HMC150/Canon A1/JVC HD1/Sony Vegas 8.0c |
|
December 11th, 2008, 02:58 PM | #54 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Other cameras in this category are actually more expensive. The nearest thing to the XHA1s would be the Sony Z5U, which is $300 more at B&H. That $4K tag was what the XH A1 was at B&H when it came out, and the price stayed there until after I bought mine, naturally, and then dropped by about $500. Now it's $3K to get rid of the stock, since the S model is available.
I'm glad for the changes on the S. The best one is having an OIS switch available instead of going to the menu. Still, I would buy the XH A1 original today and put the $1K into lights, tripod, etc. Unless, of course, $1K is not that significant to you. No doubt the price will drop after the update has been around awhile. |
December 11th, 2008, 07:18 PM | #55 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Conway, NH
Posts: 1,745
|
Quote:
I had literally one minute to go from the roof over a race track's sky boxes down to the press room so I could the press conference with the race's winner, Kevin Harvick. In that minute I had to unplug external audio inputs from the camera, take it off the tripod, disconnect the LANC, get the iris, exposure and white balance right and probably a few other things I've forgotten. The one thing I omitted, and probably didn't have time to do anyway was diving into the menus to turn the OIS on. As usual, there were no breaks in the conference where I could make the switch, so I had to improvise in that crowded room, and there's no way my improvisation is going to stabilize the footage like the OIS would. That's my story. You decide. |
|
December 12th, 2008, 08:24 AM | #56 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 656
|
Quote:
You are right about all the supporting equipment. Even if it's a second camera, you need a second tripod. I think the OP mentioned weddings, so don't forget the wireless either. At least with the A1, you can use the onboard mics for wedding ambient with good results (except in wind). Many other cameras need an onboard shotgun just for good ambient.
__________________
Panasonic HMC150/Canon A1/JVC HD1/Sony Vegas 8.0c |
|
| ||||||
|
|