|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 18th, 2008, 03:58 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Goleta, CA
Posts: 233
|
Focus on very far away objects
Was recently at the Port of Los Angeles, photographing the massive cranes in San Pedro that load/unload shipping containers from the ships. I had my xha1 set at IAF and when i looked at the footage on my mac, the cranes (which must have been about a quarter mile away from me) looked out of focus: is this because IAF simply cant focus on objects that far away?... is my only option to use manual focus?
-Steve PS: Is there ever a time when I wouldn't want to use IAF vs normal AF (obviously if a lens is blocking the IR sensor!)
__________________
www.spreefilms.com - Give me a museum and I'll fill it! |
June 18th, 2008, 04:09 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales
Posts: 734
|
I've just looked at some stuff I shot last week of birds on the coast and a lot of it looks out of focus. But a closer look shows that the problem is really from haze and the movement of air up the cliffs. Almost everything is shimmering. The auto-focus had a hard time on distant objects because of it. This wasn't the fault of the auto-focus on the A1, just the limitations of any auto-focus system under such conditions.
__________________
Canon XH A1; Canon XF100; Nikon D800 |
June 18th, 2008, 05:16 AM | #3 |
Inner Circle
|
Hi guy's...........
Steve,
The simple truth is, 1/4 mile isn't all that far away. My A1 will pick out objects in stark clear focus up to 950 metres away, that's about 2/3 of a mile. Leaving your lens in IAF in those circumstances faces it with an impossible job - what, exactly, to focus on? The cranes, which aren't "in it's face"? The huge background, which is everything else? My guess? It went to Infinity, when it should have been set (manually) to 500 odd metres (600 - 700 yards). Sorry Steve, don't do that sort of thing with a lens as sharp as the A1's, and certainly don't expect it to "think for itself" and do a better job than the operator. Annie, Don't use IAF in those circumstances, the camera doesn't have the brains for it. It's good, quite often better than the human operators who use it, but it simply cannot make those sort of decissions with any hope of accuracy. CS |
June 18th, 2008, 06:45 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales
Posts: 734
|
Chris - I shot only about 15 seconds with the autofocus on to demonstrate the problem it had focussing on a cliff in the sea mist. The other stuff only looked out of focus at first (I was using manual focus) because of the heat haze. I'm having a problem finding enough material that looks sharp enough to use in the UWOL video.
__________________
Canon XH A1; Canon XF100; Nikon D800 |
| ||||||
|
|