|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 11th, 2008, 09:19 AM | #16 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
|
|
April 11th, 2008, 10:03 AM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: AC, Belgium
Posts: 75
|
|
April 11th, 2008, 10:55 AM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales
Posts: 734
|
Quote:
Polarisers can also give strange results with a wide-angle lens, leaving half the sky pale, and the other half dark. And similarly if you are panning across a landscape - effectively you are widening the angle. Remember the polariser works best at 90 degrees to the sun.
__________________
Canon XH A1; Canon XF100; Nikon D800 |
|
April 11th, 2008, 10:55 AM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,116
|
I personally like Unsharp mask as it provides more control than Sharpen. Sharpen has only one dial, the amount of sharpness you want. Unsharp mask allows you to choose the radius and a threshold. The amount of sharpness and the settings are depending on the type of footage that you have and can and probably will, change with different scenes. For example, for closeup of faces you don't want to have much detail at all, unless you want to make people look at their worst. Watch your local news for an example of this. Excessive detail, in-camera detail, is one of the optical giveaways that something is shot on video. The ability to adjust the detail level on a shot-per-shot basis is another reason to keep the detail level of the camera at its lowest. This will provide a more filmic look and give you more control on your footage. Like with everything, shoot some tests of different subjects and check the results before shooting your masterpiece :)
|
April 11th, 2008, 03:27 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 149
|
Recently i shot some ads in HDV for SD.
My sharpening technique was editing the ad in FCP ProRes, adding 25% Sharpening. Then i nest the ProRes sequence in a SD one. The HD sharpening is not disturbing because the SD resolution is not able to read the smaller contours, but the perceived image sharpness can be raised a lot. Maybe it's even better to put the HDV clips directly in the SD sequence and apply the Sharpen there. I have to try it |
April 11th, 2008, 08:40 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 157
|
thanks for the info paolo!
Does anyone else have an opinion on in-camera sharpening vs. sharpening in fcp? |
April 12th, 2008, 06:26 AM | #22 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
And i add: in camera sharpening happens before encoding and could affect the encoding process negatively because the codec could break more easily due to excess of image information. On the other hand sharpening in FCP could be applied in different ways depending on the final media. |
|
April 12th, 2008, 11:13 AM | #23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 157
|
thanks giovanni, thats an interesting point. so it sounds like shooting at -9 is the way to go for important projects.
|
April 12th, 2008, 11:27 AM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victor, Montana
Posts: 61
|
Sharpening
Does anyone else have an opinion on in-camera sharpening vs. sharpening in fcp? "
I personally do not add sharpening in camera. You can do that in post if necessary. |
| ||||||
|
|