|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 25th, 2007, 05:07 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 57
|
Canon A1 and Letus Extreme : Footage
I took my dad down to the park today to help me test out my new rig.
I cut together some of the footage from the camera test. You can view it here. Lenses (Canon EF): 50 1.4 100 Macro 2.8 Zoom 28-135 3.5
__________________
http://www.michaelfriedman.org/ |
December 25th, 2007, 11:00 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pasadena, CA.
Posts: 53
|
Pretty cool. The exposure looks to me to be a little dark but this could be due to my monitor setup. Other than that I really liked the clip.
Jerome |
December 26th, 2007, 12:36 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 57
|
hmmm. I did crush the blacks a bit but the overall exposure should be good. Could be a Mac/PC gamma thing. I checked in in Final Cut, and on my HDTV (which should be the same as PC gamma). I'll have to check it on a Windows box...
__________________
http://www.michaelfriedman.org/ |
December 26th, 2007, 02:40 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 288
|
Beautifully Done. Looked Very Very anti-home movie. The very look im going for, dare i say film? Good Job!
__________________
Loren Simons |
December 26th, 2007, 03:05 AM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 9
|
Just gorgeous, Michael. I'd love to see some other lenses, too.
|
December 26th, 2007, 10:54 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 48
|
I dont know which version of FCP your running, but I know that FCP Studio 2 actually compensates for PC gamma by itself. In other words, you want to set your computer to normal Mac gamma and when you open final cut pro it shows you the video at pc gamma.
So if you set your computer to PC gamma and then open FCP studio 2 its going to be out of wack. I made that mistake already. but thats why you checked it on the external monitor, so it shouldn't matter. Jimmy |
December 26th, 2007, 12:25 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 57
|
Thanks for the compliments guys. It is nice to know that I didn't build this monstrosity for nothing.
__________________
http://www.michaelfriedman.org/ |
December 26th, 2007, 12:29 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 57
|
I do have the new version and I had heard about the Gamma. I have been trying every variation. I even play my cuts out through my XBOX on to my HDTV (which is where it looks _really_ different). I am going to have to ultimately decide what look to trust. It's funny, because playing back through an external monitor is not how a good portion of our work is shown these days. I watch a lot of shows on my laptop.
__________________
http://www.michaelfriedman.org/ |
December 27th, 2007, 02:35 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 32
|
|
December 27th, 2007, 06:22 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western Minnesota
Posts: 227
|
Nice looking footage. Thanks for sharing.
|
December 29th, 2007, 11:47 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
Apple's current recommendation for calibration of their cinema displays is Gamma 2.2, and native colour temperature, often abbreviated as 6500K, the same as PC settings. These fit with work that is going to be displayed on the web or indeed cross-platform. My own side of the industry, photography, has been calibrating all monitors to the gamma 2.2 standard for nearly 10 years, since Adobe tried to bring in some uniformity with their Adobe RGB colour space. I am guessing that at some point a calibration system will come to FCP as some sort of compliment or rival to the Matrox MXO. Currently this product (the MXO) seems to bringing some sense to industry in allowing the use of sensibly priced displays rather than the overpriced 'reference' monitors to check footage on a calibrated device. Again, with reference to photography, the photo industry has some amazing reference displays of its own, with higher resolution, covering a much wider colour space than achieved by the current generations of video and yet the price does not exceed US$5k. In many cases, it is less than half that. Perhaps I am off track with my ideas here? Anyone care to comment? Nice footage with the Letus BTW - I want one! Last edited by Nick Wilcox-Brown; December 29th, 2007 at 11:48 AM. Reason: added a bit! |
|
December 30th, 2007, 01:32 AM | #12 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Michael, very emotional footage. AND a great look too.
Q1 - Is that a DVTEC Pro shoulder device? Have you added additional padding? - If so - neat! Q2 - Where on the A1 are you getting the supply to the monitor from? Do you now use the A1 flip-out monitor? Q3 - What is that "lump" velcroed to the back plate? Q4 - Is that a Rad Mic Rx high up on the mic? Q5 - Did you shoot with this and/or tripod? Very steady work! - well done! Grazie |
December 30th, 2007, 01:59 AM | #13 | |||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 57
|
Thanks!
Quote:
Quote:
There are two things on the back plate. One is a FireStore. The other is an old Samson wireless receiver. Neither is held down by the velcro alone. The Firestore has a 1/4 inch screw mount into a hole in the plate and the Samson has velcro on the back with a matching piece of velcro on the plate. I mounted a receiver to my Sennheiser G2 in the hot shoe. Quote:
Also, these photos may help.
__________________
http://www.michaelfriedman.org/ |
|||
December 31st, 2007, 01:05 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 136
|
God I want a Letus Extreme...and everything else on that rig. How much did that whole rig cost you anyway?
Beautiful footage. It seriously looked like film. Good work. |
December 31st, 2007, 02:58 AM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 157
|
I liked the crushed blacks. Off topic - what glasses are those? I want a pair. Seriously, do you know?
|
| ||||||
|
|