|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 25th, 2007, 02:49 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gainesville, VA, USA
Posts: 327
|
Lens specifications of the A1 lens in 35mm terms
I'm wondering what the focal legth range is of the A1 lens in terms of 35mm. Also when I see an f stop of 1.6 is this truely 1.6 or something else really?
I'd appreciate some technical (formulas) explantion if possible rather than just numbers :) Thanks. Shiv. |
October 25th, 2007, 03:41 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Andover, Ma
Posts: 102
|
I think the lens is 25mm-650mm zoom
|
October 25th, 2007, 04:06 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
It's about 31.5 mm on the wide end, which would be about 630 on the long end. I wish it did go to 25mm!
My guess is the f-stops are more like t-stops, but I don't know. |
October 25th, 2007, 10:38 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western Minnesota
Posts: 227
|
From Canon's website on the A-1
Focal Length: 4.5mm - 90mm (32.5mm - 650mm; 35mm photo equivalent) Max. F/Stop: f/1.6 -- 35mm |
October 25th, 2007, 11:16 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Espoo Finland
Posts: 380
|
When you zoom in the f-stop drops to f/3.6 or something.
|
October 25th, 2007, 11:38 PM | #6 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
For Shiv, please see my Canon XH A1 Frequently Asked Questions page at http://www.dvinfo.net/canonxh/xhfaq.php -- thanks in advance,
|
October 26th, 2007, 02:11 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gainesville, VA, USA
Posts: 327
|
Thank you all for your replies. It is much appreciated.
Chris, I did look at the FAQ before asking. I guess I was looking for a question similar to the one I asked :) Shiv. |
October 26th, 2007, 05:51 AM | #8 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Focal length and maximum aperture values are both explained on that page.
|
October 26th, 2007, 06:03 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gainesville, VA, USA
Posts: 327
|
Yes they are. What I meant to say is that I was looking for a specific question and didn't find one that I thought would have an answer for me. I wasn't looking at the answers, just the questions.
Shiv. |
October 26th, 2007, 08:15 AM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Oops I missed it by a mm. 32.5, not 31.5. I find that to be wide enough for just about everything I do. So far I haven't had a need for a wide angle adapter and from past experience with an 8.5mm on a 2/3" chip camera, I doubt I'll need one. The same thing is not true for the XL series standard lenses. In shooting with a friend's XL2, I had the wide angle adapter on more than off. If I got the XL H1 I'd have to also get the wide angle lens.
|
October 26th, 2007, 10:47 AM | #11 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
|
Just keep in mind that the 35mm equivalent focal lengths are based on field of view, and are approximate. The aspect ratio of a standard 35mm film frame is ~3:2 while the camcorder does 16:9 or 4:3.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
October 26th, 2007, 01:43 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gainesville, VA, USA
Posts: 327
|
Don,
Right, I did forget to take that into account. So is the FOV of a 16:9 considered more than 3:2? |
October 26th, 2007, 05:29 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 83
|
Wish there was a 32.5 - 650 mm "L" lens for D-SLRs!
|
October 26th, 2007, 06:01 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 106
|
Sigma has a 50-500. That's probably as close as you can get.
__________________
"Those who dream by day are cognizant of many things which escape those who dream only by night." -- Edgar Allan Poe |
October 27th, 2007, 07:03 PM | #15 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
|
3:2 would correspond to 13.5:9
4:3 would correspond to 12:9
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
| ||||||
|
|