|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 6th, 2007, 10:14 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Steve do you see the bar to the right of the rendering screen go red? I think it has to stay green or you run into problems with blurred sections that it can't smooth out. I had the same problem and realized the clip just had too much motion.
|
October 6th, 2007, 12:16 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
The little green bar on the lower right of the screen never turns red and it doesn't go above 1/4 the way up maximum, so I dont really think its because too much movement. Im just trying to smooth out a little shake while using my monopod because I accidently had the in-camera stabilization turned off. Thats why I was curious, there is noticable blurryness and abberations even though I am not having the program resize the image. Are you keeping the same quailty resolution when using HDV footage? Thanks |
|
October 6th, 2007, 12:57 PM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
What settings are you using?
I am away from my editing machine so I don't know the exact settings. The settings I remember are the NTSC top field first, on the pull down options up top I use the third down that says (intense rendering), then in the bottom right I choose upscale to remove border. I can check all the settings in detail tomorrow. I have not delivered HDV with Marcalli used on the clips. I have delivered HDV down converted to DVD and the results were excellent. This coming week I am looking into how much is lost in HD. |
October 6th, 2007, 01:30 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Paul, I have used both the HDV upper field first and the Premiere CS3 setting, I also use the 3rd down (intensive). I also have used all of the different border settings to the same effect. (sporatic blurryness ect.) I am monitoring the output via a 23" LCD samsung so the effect is quite pernounced. If you are not noticing any loss of resolution or some weird motion blur effect, I wonder what the problem could be. Are you applying the effect to HDV then rendering and downconverting to DV or are you applying the Mercalli to the DV that was downconverted? Yes if you find out any info on resolution loss on HDV in your tests let me know. |
|
October 7th, 2007, 10:39 AM | #20 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Steve,
Still out of the office on a shoot and it looks like I will not be at the editing machine till tomorrow afternoon. I do edit HDV then add the effect prior to rendering out to DVD. Will look into it more and let you know what I find. |
October 7th, 2007, 10:46 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 302
|
|
October 7th, 2007, 11:36 AM | #22 |
Ruler of the DownUnder UnderWorld
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cairns- Queensland - Australia
Posts: 248
|
Prodad's new Mercalli is great.
Here is a 1280/720 wmv before and after underwater shot straight out of an EDIUS HDV timeline. BEFORE http://www.hdvunderwater.com/prodad/shaky2a.wmv AFTER http://www.hdvunderwater.com/prodad/shaky2.wmv So easy and very quick to use. |
October 8th, 2007, 08:44 AM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Steve,
Here are my settings. Profiles: Precise Image stabilization (intensive rendering) Video-Format: Top Field First (NTSC) Compare View: Final Result Motion Detection: max at more valid Important picture area: Neutral Special Video Analysis: Detect Fast Motions Particular Distinguishing Characteristics: Also detect object contours Camera Stabilization: Smooth Camera balance: In balance Camera Motion: Also tilt compensation Border area: Without Border (upscale) Min After looking at Paul's clip and looking at many on my timeline with Mercalli it does soften the clips in HDV. If there is too much motion I can see blurred sections. But for $119 it seems well worth the money. Nothing beats stable footage off the camera. |
October 8th, 2007, 11:03 AM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 347
|
I noticed the same thing in some clips of my timeline. I guess that is just matter of find a happy mid of stabilization vs picture quality. For the price I don't mind since there is not too many filter options out there.
|
October 8th, 2007, 05:00 PM | #25 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Thanks for your tests and input fellas! Steve |
|
October 13th, 2007, 01:22 PM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 26
|
|
| ||||||
|
|