|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 1st, 2007, 03:33 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 17
|
Wearing out Heads?
How bad is it for the heads in my A1 to use my camera instead of a deck for logging and capturing? I import a good amount of footage. Maybe around 20 hours a month.
|
September 1st, 2007, 03:51 PM | #2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I wouldn't call that a big amount. I've said many times on this site that I firmly believe the whole "wearing out the heads" question is a complete non-issue and one of those internet myths, along the likes of plastic lenses, USB to FireWire adapters, Video8 to VHS adapters and so on. There's a VCR mode on the camcorder and it's meant to be used. If wearing out the heads was actually a viable issue, then the VCR mode never would have been included in the first place.
However I would urge you to consider a consumer Canon HDV camcorder such as the HV20 to use as a playback deck instead of your XH A1, primarily because your A1 shouldn't be tied down for capture purposes when it could be out shooting instead. If a camera isn't shooting, then it isn't making money. In this regard the little HV20 will pay for itself in no time (it's less than $1000). Hope this helps, |
September 1st, 2007, 05:29 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
How about the HV10? it's even cheaper.
|
September 1st, 2007, 08:06 PM | #4 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Either one... though HV10 availability might be questionable.
|
September 1st, 2007, 09:54 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 294
|
They're selling the hv10 at costco in Toronto at the moment.
But I thought there was a reason for choosing the hv20 over the hv10 in the first place. 24p option, or true 1080 and the output options. I didn't even realize the hv10 was a deck option for the A1. Trish |
September 1st, 2007, 10:05 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
go for the hv20. it's worth the extra money.
|
September 2nd, 2007, 09:51 AM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
If all you're doing is using it as a deck, there's nothing wrong with the HV10, from all I've read. While it will not record 24p, it does play back all the Canon modes, 24/30f as well as 60i.
The HV20 records 24p, but my understanding is that it only outputs a pulldown version. It will play the XH A1 24p OK, but it's own 24p comes out as pulldown. I'm not sure how that would translate into a 24p timeline. If I intended to use the little camera as a second camera or backup for the XH A1, then I'd definitely go for the UV20, because the HV10 has no external audio input at all. On the other hand, it is smaller and would fit into a jacket pocket easier, nice for a little camera to carry around all the time. |
September 2nd, 2007, 10:13 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Andover, Ma
Posts: 102
|
when it plays back or downloads onto hdd it really just READS the file already encoded on the digital tape. It has nothing to do with frame rate as long as it's an HDV format.....
|
September 2nd, 2007, 11:34 AM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...yUsed&Q=448812 Mike
__________________
Chapter one, line one. The BH. Last edited by Mike Teutsch; September 2nd, 2007 at 11:35 AM. Reason: Added new and corrected price |
|
September 2nd, 2007, 11:37 AM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 2,614
|
The HV20 records 24p to tape as 60i.
M
__________________
Chapter one, line one. The BH. |
September 2nd, 2007, 12:56 PM | #11 |
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
Generally head life is approx 2,000 hours.... give or take. Prior to this, dropouts will start occurring. The CANON HV20 is probably an alternative for playback. The HDMI output of the HV20 is an added bonus...........one cable for video and audio into a HD Television.
__________________
Lou Bruno |
September 2nd, 2007, 05:40 PM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Using the camera for playback doesn't put any record hours on the heads, only playback hours. I have thousands of playback hours on some DVCAM and Betacam SP decks with no trouble at all, and the same decks probably have only a few hundred hours of record time.
|
September 3rd, 2007, 04:53 AM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 2,919
|
I agree with Chris in post 2. Technically, something else will go in the camera before you wear out the head.
|
| ||||||
|
|