|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 5th, 2007, 09:56 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 339
|
A few more questions please
In the continued quest to be a better educated consumer as I plan to buy one of these units in about 3 weeks if all goes well here a a some more...
Please bear with me and thank you. 1)Is there a simple,easy to use program that will faithfully import HD video into the PC without any (or very minimal) frame loss with the audio audio fully in sync?I see HDV splitter has been mentioned here,does it do a good,reliable job?Any opinions or suggestions based on practical experience welcomed! 2)Will my Canon ZR-1000 remote controller work on the XH-A1?The ZR-2000 is on the pricey side and my budget is limited mostly to getiing the A1 itself. 3)If DV/SD video takes about 12-13 gigs per hour of tape how hard drive hungry is HDV? 4)Since one can shoot in SD/4:3 "1080x1080" mode on the A1,can I take that tape after recording,play it on the GL-2 & it will look normal with the aspect ratio,proportions and size correct?Better yet,could the contents of that tape be imported into the PC/Premiere 6.5 if I had the right preset downloaded from Adobe? 4B)Going the other direction,can one successfully play a GL-2 tape on the A1? 5)Can I capture/record SD 4:3/1080 footage from the A1 via firewire to the GL-2?Whats behind this is that I'm trying to determine the degree of compatibility & potential interchangibility with the tapes of the 2 units.I have had my oldest GL-2 almost since it came out on the market and have a sizable archive. 6)What is the physical size difference between the 2 models? That's all for now.The clock is counting down on this purchase. Very much appreciated. Bruce |
August 5th, 2007, 10:34 PM | #2 | |||||
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
August 6th, 2007, 01:46 PM | #3 | |||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Note: HDV is actually recorded at 1920x1440 with 1.33:1 pixels.
__________________
Kevin | www.kraentertainment.com A picture is worth 1,000 words | A 2 hour film at 24fps is worth 172,800,000 words |
|||
August 6th, 2007, 02:35 PM | #4 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I think you meant to say that HDV is actually recorded to tape at 1440 x 1080 with 1.33:1 pixels.
|
August 6th, 2007, 02:40 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 112
|
Yep. Thats what I meant. :)
__________________
Kevin | www.kraentertainment.com A picture is worth 1,000 words | A 2 hour film at 24fps is worth 172,800,000 words |
August 6th, 2007, 06:50 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 339
|
What did the Canon brochure then mean
they stated in the specs that one of the "shooting modes" is:
Copied and pasted: Image Sensor 3 - 1/3" Native 16:9 CCDs 1440 x 1080 Total Pixels Approx. 1.67 Megapixels Tape Recording HD: 1440 x 1080; Approx. 1.56 Megapixels SD (4:3): 1080 x 1080; Approx. 1.17 Megapixels SD (16:9): 1440 x 1080; Approx. 1.56 Megapixels the middle selection SD (4:3) 1080 x 1080 et. al. How does this correlate with what's stated in this thread thus far? Are you gents saying that 1080 x 1080 is not possible in SD 4:3 mode? Where the specs in this respect wrong? Have mercy, I'm just trying to understand what this can and cannot do! Also how many effective mega pixels does the GL-2 have in comparison? Thanks for all of your responses. Bruce |
August 6th, 2007, 09:16 PM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
Took me a few minutes to figure this one out, as the 1080x1080 is NOT mentioned in either the XH brochure or the user manual; it only shows up on the Canon web pages for the cameras.
Those pixel counts relate to the CCD block, not the final image. The camera uses that area of CCD pixels -- less than the total pixels on the CCD -- to create the image, which they call the "effective pixels." For a final product of SD 4:3, the 720x480 image with a pixel aspect ratio of 0.9 is created by downsampling from 1080x1080 CCD effective pixels. For a final product of SD 16:9, 720x480 with a pixel aspect ratio of 1.2, the CCD pixel array used is 1440x1080 effective pixels. It is no coincidence that 1.2/9=1.33 and 1440/1080=1.33. By comparison, the GL2 uses 380K effective pixels.
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
August 7th, 2007, 11:00 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 339
|
So does considerably more "effective pixels"
in the XH-A1 translate to a much better quality picture comparatively speaking over the GL-2?Are the CCD's better and the density of pixels greater? Is 380k a far cry from 1.17 megapixels?Are these specs misleading?
By that I mean obviously when both are used in 4:3/720 by 480 mode. Also,can Premiere Pro 2 successfully import HDV/.m2t files directly into the timeline if the HDV files already reside on the internal hard drive?In general can PP2 capture HDV footage directly from the A1 via firewire without dropouts,sync problems,etc.?What problems have you run into and how were they worked out? Thanks once again! Bruce |
April 5th, 2008, 06:31 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 558
|
Quote:
thanks |
|
April 6th, 2008, 03:35 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Warrington England
Posts: 143
|
[QUOTE=Bruce Pelley;724059
1)Is there a simple,easy to use program that will faithfully import HD video into the PC without any (or very minimal) frame loss with the audio audio fully in sync?I see HDV splitter has been mentioned here,does it do a good,reliable job?Any opinions or suggestions based on practical experience welcomed! Try pinnacle studio 11 very easy to use and will import HD and audio together and in sync. Alan |
| ||||||
|
|