|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 31st, 2007, 03:57 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 291
|
cleaner to gain down -3db?
Is it potentially cleaner to gain down -3db when shooting with this camera? I have some footage and I am sure the camera was set to 0db gain and auto gain was off (I was not shooting, I was being shot) and while most was very clean, some in relatively bright lighting conditions outdoors bright day, there are scenes that are very noisy, so I am curious if shooting -3db is a way to keep it a bit cleaner in shooting, assuming enough light natural or artificial of course.
Whats the downside to this? Stephen Eastwood http://www.StephenEastwood.com |
July 31st, 2007, 04:02 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
i've run into this too and -3db didn't help. i don't think the exposure meter is very accurate. i've been "over exposing" by a notch or three and have gotten cleaner results. please try it and let me know if that's the case..or if it's just me.
i also import with an hv20 and monitor the source footage via hdmi/1080i/32" the a1 is capable of some really clean images in bright and dark settings..so i'm sure the odd grain issues are exposure issues. |
July 31st, 2007, 06:17 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bruce Pennisula, Canada
Posts: 316
|
I'm usually shooting using Steve Dempsey's VIVGRB preset and -3db gain. I have only once come across video noise in almost all daylight recording situations be them full sun or cloudy. In particular I was filming elephants at a zoo with a painted brown post behind the animals. Everything about the shot is perfect except for sparkling pixels on the brown post. I don't have an explantion for it, but I don't think it is necessarily noise caused by any sort of gain influence.
Whenever I can get away with -3db I use it. I have seen extremely subtle sparkling on some thing I shot at +0db although rare and more like film grain....mostly on large flat coloured surfaces not unlike the brown post in the above example.
__________________
For Stock Footage http://www.revostock.com/ViewProfile.html?&ID=4811 My Website http://www.soundprostudios.com |
July 31st, 2007, 06:41 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 112
|
When using Steve Dempsey's VIVGRB Preset and 0 or -3 gain I found that there was a considerable abount of grain in the grean and red channel. I have not had the grain show up at -3 in any other Preset that I have used.
__________________
Kevin | www.kraentertainment.com A picture is worth 1,000 words | A 2 hour film at 24fps is worth 172,800,000 words |
July 31st, 2007, 06:55 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
The only downides to -3db is the (obvious) loss of light, and the potentially less dynamic range. I don't know anyone who has measured the dynamic range of each gain setting independantly, and I suspect that 0db has very slightly greater lattitude.
Noise can be caused by a warm sensor (30+ minutes of shooting), narrow spectrum light (tungsten), or dark scenes (low key). |
July 31st, 2007, 07:11 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
James, YES! What I'm speaking of is more like a film grain...and I really don't like it.
|
August 1st, 2007, 07:02 AM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,487
|
The 0 dB gain setting was probably arrived at based on using the optimal portion of the light sensitivity range of the CCD. The sweet range in the CCD transfer function of converting light to electricity. Using -3 dB gain effectively pushes the noise floor of the CCD down 3 dB. That is generally good. But in the process it also cuts 3 dB off the high end (bright light) headroom of the light-to-electricity conversion curve of the CCD, which might introduce other artifacts under certain scene conditions; e.g., possibly more susceptibility to vertical smear from bright point sources of light and other non-linear behaviors. You have to judge whether or not -3 dB works for you.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
August 1st, 2007, 10:32 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 49
|
Could the noise using VIVIDRGB be caused by the +25 Color Gain setting?
|
August 2nd, 2007, 01:14 AM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bruce Pennisula, Canada
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
So your seeing noise/grain, but is it very often? Or just in some very unique situtations. I don't see the corelation between exposure and noise. Can you explain your thoughts on this?
__________________
For Stock Footage http://www.revostock.com/ViewProfile.html?&ID=4811 My Website http://www.soundprostudios.com |
|
August 2nd, 2007, 07:47 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
|
It’s not very often.
I wish I could explain it. At least then I could identify the issue and solve it. Frankly, it’s no worse than what can be seen on any HD broadcast…. and I am a bit OCD when it comes to a “clean” image |
August 2nd, 2007, 12:12 PM | #11 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,487
|
Slower shutter speeds can result in more visible grain thanks to the longer integration time for the dark current of the individual pixels.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
August 2nd, 2007, 09:42 PM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 16
|
James - How is the overall brightness of your video at -3?
I tried using the VIVIDRGB preset earlier today, the image was really bright. I tried using the nd filter which darkened the image and really brought out the colors, but there was considerable noise. Perhaps not using nd and instead lowering the gain to -3 might improve things. So far with this camera, whether day, night, auto, manual, I have some degree of noise. I love my camera, but I'll love it more if I can get rid of the noise. |
August 3rd, 2007, 12:00 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bruce Pennisula, Canada
Posts: 316
|
[QUOTE=Scott Becker;722638]James - How is the overall brightness of your video at -3? [QUOTE]
In daylight situations I have no issues with the brightness of the video. Generally I'm trying to stay in the sweet spot of the lens aperture at around f4-5 and shutter speeds of 60fps. Depending on the amount of available daylight this may need none, one or both ND filters with a gain of -3 to achieve a suitable exposure. IMO the XHA1 has very low noise levels and I certainly don't have any issue with the camera.
__________________
For Stock Footage http://www.revostock.com/ViewProfile.html?&ID=4811 My Website http://www.soundprostudios.com Last edited by James Hooey; August 3rd, 2007 at 12:04 AM. Reason: added content |
August 3rd, 2007, 12:36 PM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
I shoot in bright light on the water and found that the camera ND is much better then ND add on filters. I purchased a .6 and 1.2 Formatt ND filters and Hoya Pro1Digital filters ND x4 and NDx8 and did not like the results. Also when I have both ND camera filters on and still have too much light to have the iris in the 3-5 range I put the shutter to 120 with excellent results.
As for the VIVID with grain I found cutting down the color gain to 15 helped and lowering the red gain also. Now no grain unless I under expose trusing the camera meter. I all most always go one to two stops more open then the meter recommends and always use -3 gain while shooting outdoors. Hope this helps. Last edited by Paul Cronin; August 3rd, 2007 at 02:00 PM. |
| ||||||
|
|