|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 14th, 2012, 03:04 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
|
Wb xf305
I always manual WB. I have noticed though if I try and dial in the equivalent into preset, say 3200k the settings have a different cast and I cannot get them to match by scrolling through temp settings in preset. So a manual setting of 3200k is cooler than the dialled in preset equivalent, which is warmer! The preset I have to say looks more accurate on the LCD.
Am I missing something? |
January 15th, 2012, 07:29 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 38
|
Re: Wb xf305
You're not missing anything - its pretty common with all cameras.
I am not techie enough to go into details but my understanding is, in very basic terms (NB: I am not being completely accurate to the way the signal is processed): the image is composed of R, G and B, and a white balance setting of, for example 3200K, can actually be composed of different values of R, G and B. Hence, two settings at seemingly the same 3200K can have different looks as they are composed of different RGB values. I'd expect the presents dialed-in values to have a better, more balanced look. When doing a manual white balance you may well be subjecting the camera to a light source that is far from ideal - i.e. one that has spikes or inconsistencies which may cause it to overcompensate in certain areas and thus cause a slightly cooler look... In larger broadcast cameras its possible to go into the WB menu settings and change the R and G gain etc of your A, B and presets, and in the XF cameras you can go into the Custom Pict settings to tweak gain in white balance - you could try this, or go into the colour correction settings... When white balance I will often do two different white balances on A and B, compare the two and then see if I prefer the look if I dial in the K setting manually... and then just go with what I prefer. Hope that helps. Chris |
January 19th, 2012, 04:37 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 36
|
Re: Wb xf305
Thanks a lot for this explanation Chris. It makes perfect sense. I used to think that Custom White Balance does automatically adjust the RGB gain when using a non ideal light source with different amounts of RGB. But it obviously does not. I always had a slight color cast even when using Custom White Balance and lighting with matched color temperature. I tried to fix it using the Color Matrix settings but was never fully satisfied.
Thankfully you mentioned this Custom Picture White Balance adjustablility which I had totally forgotten and overlooked. Using this I was able to set a technically perfect WB under my lighting condtions. What I did: After setting Custom White Balance I zoomed in on a neutral grey card so it filled the frame entirely. Then I switched on the Vector Scope and went to Custom Picture > White Balance > R If there's a color cast the Vector Scope dot representing the neutral color cast free grey will be off the middle. It was indeed by a tiny, barely visible amount. I was able to adjust the R, G, B gain until the dot was exactly in the middle. The neccessary movement of the dot (R-2, G0, B1) was optically very, very tiny but the difference was stunning: a technically perfect color cast free image. |
January 19th, 2012, 11:47 AM | #4 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Re: Wb xf305
For me this has been the very best thread, on this subject, in yonks. Thanks gentlemen.
I've been experimenting (playing) with the Colour Balance FX in SONY Vegas, and was becoming very aware of the way to "WHITE" by adjusting and adjusting back the RGB sliders and checking Vegas Scopes. That was an eye opener too. Grazie |
January 19th, 2012, 03:53 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
Chris, a belated thank you for your response. A great reply. Its mainly interior lighting I find that gives the different colour casts with equal colour settings , but I have learnt to trust my eye with the dialled in value, I have set the LCD to the point where I can dial it back to about right. I have noticed that when I balance the 305 against a Panasonic or Sony 2/3 broadcast camera I can get vastly different values for the same look though, I trust my eye for now!
|
January 19th, 2012, 06:18 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
Quote:
|
|
January 19th, 2012, 08:53 PM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,389
|
Re: Wb xf305
I just dealt with this yesterday. Perfect explanation and I made the decision to use the preset instead of manual. Worked great! With the explanation of how to use the grey and vector scope, it should be easier to do manual WB accurately! Thanks!
__________________
The older I get, the better I was! |
January 24th, 2012, 11:00 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 38
|
Re: Wb xf305
Hi - glad to help - and glad my explanation made sense :o)
I have found the XF white balancing to be a little awkward on occasion, but have had more severe results with EX cameras - which at times can been VERY off. Adjusting the CP white balance the way Martin suggests is a good way to go if you're not happy with the whites. Its funny - when I started shooting we were using the BVW400 - with nothing more than a b&w VF, and never worried - you pressed the WB button, the camera said 'ok' and all was good... Simple as that! I sometimes think these technical advances just make our lives more complicated! ;) Chris |
January 26th, 2012, 06:05 AM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
Quote:
|
|
February 3rd, 2012, 03:28 PM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Laguna Woods CA
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
Quote:
Is this custom picture W B adjustment a global setting or do you have to do this for each custom picture preset you use?
__________________
Regards Mike |
|
February 3rd, 2012, 05:33 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
Im sure its per CP file.
|
February 3rd, 2012, 09:11 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Laguna Woods CA
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
Thanks Matt.
__________________
Regards Mike |
April 20th, 2012, 11:37 AM | #13 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 36
|
Re: Wb xf305
Quote:
1) A grey card is for setting exposure and will give different (less accurate) results than a dedicated spectral correct white balance card which I use now. Before step 2 I now go to OTHER FUNCTIONS > WFM and set the vectorscope gain to 5x. The dot size increases but with the 5 times zoom it is much easier to center the dot and it is also 5 times more accurate. |
|
April 27th, 2012, 06:25 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 53
|
Re: Wb xf305
So now we have the manual WB on A + B sorted do we now adjust the dialled in values with the vector scope so it centres under identical natural lighting conditions and Kelvin values? It's a little green in comparison.
Or shall I leave well alone? |
April 28th, 2012, 06:58 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 456
|
Re: Wb xf305
Amazing differences, especially in overcast days with window light. The blue is gone. Colors are right on (at least in the VF & LCD). Thanks for this essential info.
__________________
Al Upper left hand corner of the map |
| ||||||
|
|