|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 7th, 2010, 07:07 AM | #1 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Press Release: Canon's New XF305 and XF300 Professional HD Camcorder
Read the press release here: http://www.dvinfo.net/news/canons-ne...amcorders.html
Quote:
|
|
April 7th, 2010, 07:07 AM | #2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
High-res pics... click to embiggen.
|
April 7th, 2010, 07:08 AM | #3 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
And more pics.... click to see 'em big.
|
April 7th, 2010, 07:48 AM | #4 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I have to say, though -- these came in at higher prices than I expected ($8000 with SDI and $6800 without SDI). Honestly I had figured they would be much closer in price to the XH series.
|
April 7th, 2010, 07:49 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 201
|
This is a very exciting camcorder and a great improvment of the XHA1. But I'm worried that it seems there is no annoucement for an interchangeable lens version…
__________________
http://www.songesdemoai.com/ |
April 7th, 2010, 07:55 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 139
|
I was so excited... right up to the CMOS bit.
|
April 7th, 2010, 07:56 AM | #7 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Just because they didn't say anything about an XL version doesn't mean it ain't going to happen. It would be too much too soon for them to announce an XL version today. They tend to spread out their major product announcements, just like all the big manufacturers do. I think they took a look at how the XH series had so much greater market penetration than the XL H series did, and decided therefore to push the XF ahead of the XL F (if that's what it's actually going to be called; just a guess on my part).
|
April 7th, 2010, 08:03 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
But wow, these prices are a little surprise for me as well! |
|
April 7th, 2010, 08:09 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
|
|
April 7th, 2010, 08:14 AM | #10 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
1/3rd-inch was reported here as officially confirmed by Canon USA way back in February.
|
April 7th, 2010, 08:27 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 190
|
WOW!! Wayyyyy over priced for what it is. IMHO.
Ben |
April 7th, 2010, 08:31 AM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: beijing china
Posts: 7
|
And pal frame rates require additional upgrade.
"Optional 50i/25p Frame Rate Upgrade For added versatility, XF305 can be customized to record in both 60i/50i and 24p/25p (this optional upgrade must be performed by a Canon Factory Service Center)." Nothing about 50p? |
April 7th, 2010, 08:35 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 566
|
We're saving up for an HD cam (upgrading from an XL2) and like everybody else, was eagerly awaiting for Canon's new cam announcement. Before, I was set up to save for an EX1R, but thought, wait...Canon's got some new stuff coming out! Then, I read the specs...and the prices...
Might have to go back saving pennies for the EX1R...
__________________
--JA |
April 7th, 2010, 08:38 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Teaneck, NJ
Posts: 659
|
I would hold off on over-priced comments considering the technology required to record 4:2:2 50Mbps video. I am presuming that, like Sony and the NanoFlash, Canon's implementation of 4:2:2 requires a second processor. This adds significantly to the cost. I in fact am amazed that Canon is able to bring 4:2:2 50Mbps at this price point.
The only weak link here is the SDHC card. I can easily see too many users trying to use the cheapest card they can find, disregarding specs, and then filling the boards with complaints of media errors and dropped frames. I'm looking forward to a good look at NAB and am I already predisposed to writing positively about it and its pricing. |
April 7th, 2010, 08:39 AM | #15 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
I noticed both cameras have HDMI output which makes the HD-SDI not as important as it once was. Unless of course you work with other broadcast equipment that uses HD-SDI.
I do have to agree about the price. Considering the SONY EX1 is cheaper and uses 1/2" CMOS with full HD-SDI this price seems a bit extreme. The only advantage is the 4:2:2 and higher bitrate recording which in the progressive world isn't as important as many once thought it was. Of course for interlaced shooters 4:2:2 and 50 mbits is a pretty big deal but is that really worth $3,000.00? Although CF cards are much cheaper then SxS cards. The fact that the camera does have HDMI does make the whole 4:2:2 for keying issue kind of interesting. As a visual effects artist I would still prefer to capture HDMI directly into Prores. For the event videographer I could still see them preferring the EX1 since it sounds like it may be better in low light situations. We won't really know if that will be true until we actually see the performance of the camera but the physics of chip design usually means a full raster 1/2" chip will be more sensitive then a full raster 1/3" chip. Cmos I really don't see as an issue. I think very soon we will see everything switch to Cmos. There are very few CCD based cameras left and other then rolling shutter they are a huge advantage to not only image quality but how far companies can push these cameras. It is so much easier to deliver the quality we want with Cmos then it is to deal with the issues of CCD design. CCD is just a pain to deal with for HD cameras. Too many trade offs and/or workarounds. |
| ||||||
|
|