|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 4th, 2018, 10:31 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
Guess I waited too many years before I actually needed an RA-V1, but I am now in need of
using the Canon HF-M41 camcorder on a tripod with remote control of zoom, start, and stop. I have had a Canon ZR-1000 LANC Zoom Controller for many years that I used with the LANC input on my Sony VX2000 and Sony Hi8 cameras. The Canon HF-M41 does not have a LANC input. That zoom controller interfaces with the RA-V1 adapter that fits the Canon HF-M41 mini advanced hotshoe and provides a LANC input. The problem is that it cannot be found anywhere. It was discontinued and none seem to be available used either. https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/c...-adapter-ra-v1 Does anyone here know where I can buy a used one? Does anyone here know of a substitute for using the camera on a tripod effectively for zoom, start, and stop? Or does anyone here know of a DIY plan to create an interface for the mini-advanced hotshoe with pinouts I can use to make my own LANC socket? Thanks, John |
February 4th, 2018, 04:57 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
Finding one on the used market/auction sites will be hit or miss and require a bit of luck.
I see some vendors in AU may have one in stock - for a price. Can you make do with the WL-D89 wireless remote control. It offers stop/stop and zoom control. The camcorder has sensors front and back, and the remote probably could be mounted to a tripod handle with some Velcro.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
February 4th, 2018, 07:07 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
I see what you mean Don about the prices. Wow!
I haven't tried using the wireless remote yet. I figured it would not be very responsive since I have always used physical zoom controllers for my cameras. Worth a try if that is the only practical option. I am pretty good with electronics device construction, but I would need a plan or at least the pinouts for the hot shoe on the Canon. I'll try the wireless remote. Thanks for the input. John |
February 4th, 2018, 07:10 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
|
February 4th, 2018, 07:13 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
Good to know Bryan.
Thanks, John |
February 4th, 2018, 09:00 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
Yes, it's infrared (I think), but I'm sure Don's suggestion would work if the controller is mounted on the tripod handle in such a way that the sensor catches the beam - probably easiest if the handle is mounted on the left side.
I recall some years back seeing a DIY (PVC tube) cage/rig where the guy had used a length of optical cable to direct the controller beam onto an IR sensor located at the front of the camcorder. Edit: I think it was this one: http://www.primitivebuteffective.com...ontroller.html Crude but effective, apparently. He referenced a DVInfo forum thread from back in 2003 as the inspiration: http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/remote-l...ontroller.html Last edited by Bryan Worsley; February 4th, 2018 at 11:26 PM. |
February 4th, 2018, 11:21 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
Sounds like a doable modification. I think I will test out the remote when I shoot this Thursday to see how responsive it is, then I may try that mod if it seems really slow. These are just rehearsal shoots which I then upload to You Tube for the actors and directors to review their work. A light weight easily portable setup seems to work best for me. Thus the small camera.
Thanks again Bryan for the links. John |
February 4th, 2018, 11:54 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
There are a couple of Australian online suppliers who appear to stock the RA-V1 adapter:
https://www.dccameras.com.au/canon-r...l-adaptor.html https://www.digidirect.com.au/access...ontrol_adapter I would assume those prices are Aus $. Even so that's 180-190 US$. Ridiculous. |
February 5th, 2018, 07:28 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
I know, I had seen those. Pretty crazy. Even the Canon website (that I linked in the OP) had the original list price at $130. Canon used to include LANC on their cameras at one time and their ZR-1000 (and ZR-2000) worked so well that I bought the ZR-1000 to use on my Sony cameras. It still works great.
John |
February 5th, 2018, 08:11 AM | #10 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
FWIW: Canon still includes LANC (a 2.5mm jack labeled "remote" on the camcorder) on many of their higher end camcorders but likely dropped it as a cost savings on many consumer camcorders.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
February 5th, 2018, 08:14 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
The current (budget) consumer HD camcorder models (HF-R80/82/800) don't even have an IR remote sensor - instead (R-80/82 only) a WiFi feature ('Near Field Communication') that facilitates some remote control/monitor functionality via a (compatible) smartphone app. From what I've read though the monitor feedback is very laggy and it's hardly practical as a remote control for tripod operation.
|
February 5th, 2018, 08:28 AM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
|
Re: Substitute for RA-V1 advanced hotshoe to LANC ?
Quote:
So much for the speed-reading course I've been taking ;>) |
|
| ||||||
|
|