|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 5th, 2011, 10:23 AM | #16 | ||||
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Here's the deal: If you want Compact Flash and a 50mbps format, stick with Canon XF. If you prefer SDHC and the AVCHD format, then the XA10 is an option. |
||||
January 5th, 2011, 10:41 AM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
pro. features aside I wonder which one has better overall performance, as soon as they both available I'll do side by side XF100 and XA10, I'm guessing they'll be close
__________________
I love this place! |
January 5th, 2011, 12:00 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 775
|
I fly out to Vegas for CES tomorrow so I'll try to get pics and video of the new cams when I get there.
|
January 5th, 2011, 12:03 PM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
The XA10 has a touch screen LCD - unlike the XF100. If you look at the (albeit flash driven demos) on the Canon USA website of how this screen can be used (e.g. for 'Touch and Track' focus and exposure, also for selecting clips to review/playback) it certainly looks impressive and highly useful that it is a touch screen.
Note that you need to look at some of the "lesser" new VIXIA models to see these demos - as they are not in the detailed 'Features' and 'Specification' pages of the XA10 section of the Canon website (but these features are mentioned - so it has them!)
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
January 5th, 2011, 12:04 PM | #20 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
But the JVC HM100 & HM700 shoot in XDCam (MPEG-2 codec) in either a .MXF wrapper or a .MOV wrapper (built for FCP). Codec vs. wrapper two very different & sometimes confusing things. Quote:
The only limits of recording a specific codec (XDCam, DVCPro HD, AVCHD, etc. etc.) to a specific medium (SDHC, CF, P2, SxS, etc. etc.) is the models of cameras the manufactures choose to produce & an acceptable read/write speed of the medium that matches the necessary bandwith of a codec. Quote:
Or, the best camera out there, is the best camera for you, which is often different than the best camera for the next guy, which is different than the best camera for me. I'm impressed with, imho, the good selection of cameras Canon has released in the last year, yet none of them are as much as an improvement over what I have / need for me to be willing to go purchase something new.
__________________
Nothing says you're a serious video maker like S-VHS Last edited by Zach Love; January 5th, 2011 at 03:48 PM. Reason: more info |
|||
January 5th, 2011, 12:22 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 775
|
The more I look at the new HF G10, the more I see its potential as a fairly significant upgrade compared to their former top of the line HF S21.
A 2MP sensor optimized for video as opposed to an 8MP for both video and stills. Having both a focus ring in addition to the custom dial (both rings customizable). A waveform monitor!!! 16 variable zoom speeds (just like my XLH1S). Manual white balance adjustment via a Kelvin dial in 100k increments... finally!!! (just like my XLH1S). Looks like a great small camera to use! Canon says of the new sensor: - Video resolution of 900 horizontal and 800 vertical TV lines, for Full HD video with professional precision - A 25 percent improvement in low-light sensitivity with a minimum illumination rating of 1.5 Lux, Canon's lowest Lux rating to date in a consumer HD camcorder - A 280 percent improvement in dynamic range for exceptional reproduction of both highlights and shadows |
January 5th, 2011, 01:01 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tavares Fla
Posts: 541
|
NAB could be a very interesting place to be in April if the technology leaps continued into the pro stuff.
|
January 5th, 2011, 01:28 PM | #23 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Quote:
What a difference 5 years make! For this reason, I am now trying to find a way to shoot great stuff with these small camcorders instead of buying a $10,000 camcorder like I did a while back. Combined with the VDSLR developments, I think you can create awesome stuff with a combination of camcorder + VDSLR and some proper lenses. The ergonomics are where the challenges are with this type of gear. But also the opportunities, as I can get into places with a small camcorder my XL-H1 can't get to. And you can carry them always, everywhere. Wonderful times indeed! Here is the link on Canon's website: http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consum...f_g10#Overview Seriously impressed by all its features, I hope they don't limit the manual controls too much. I work at Canon (office printer division), so I can get it at discount rate... which usually means 20-30% off the MSRP. But I am not fixed at Canon, I also like Panasonic gear a lot so I am eager to find out what they will show later today). |
|
January 5th, 2011, 01:59 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york city, new york
Posts: 594
|
i wonder if the newly released canon xa10 could be set-up with a nanoflash?
if so, i also wonder if the nanoflash footage would still be limited to 24mbps? the xa10 does have a mini hdmi out. be well rob |
January 5th, 2011, 02:11 PM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
It is good to see that after years of Megapixels races on these camcorders we are finally getting back to what really matters, image quality (for video). I doubt many people shoot stills on a camcorder, I always considered it a gimmick. Also, most people view their stills on a computer or monitor nowadays, for which 1080p extracts will do perfectly fine. It also looks like camcorder manufacturers, after the VDSLR surge, need to add extra attention, features and resources to their camcorder line-ups, to keep them alive. Canon's is normally the most conservative of the bunch (and late to the party), so I am looking forward to the other player's camcorder offerings at CES 2011. I hope they also unveil their EVIL system, but I don't expect that to happen at this year's CES.
|
January 5th, 2011, 02:29 PM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Reading, PA USA and Athens, Greece
Posts: 269
|
24mbps AVCHD and 4:2:0... so basically an XH A1 with a bit better low light, full 1920x1080 res and single CMOS vs 3CCD...
Ill stick with the XH A1 for now. shame canon did not develop an MXF codec CCD camera. |
January 5th, 2011, 02:54 PM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
CCD technology is dead in the consumer market. All new camera's... DSLR, camcorder, mobile phone... everything is CMOS. So I don't see any company launching CCD based camera gear in the consumer/prosumer/professional market (only the high-end maybe).
|
January 5th, 2011, 03:11 PM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 532
|
Hey Chris, I can't find any pictures in that press release link.
__________________
twitter.com/evancking |
January 5th, 2011, 03:43 PM | #29 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
Good (Picture Quality); CCD; Cheap... Pick two CMOS is deadly to people who shoot Blair Witch handheld films in night clubs with strobe lights. But I believe for the rest of us CMOS has been a helpful way to keep prices low, while increasing picture quality.
__________________
Nothing says you're a serious video maker like S-VHS |
|
January 5th, 2011, 05:48 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 211
|
Question
Does anyone know if this will have the assignable ring (aperture, zoom, focus) like the XF100? ALso will me varizoom lanc I use with my xh-a1 work with this as well?
Thanks!
__________________
Jonathan Schwartz CA Video Productions |
| ||||||
|
|