|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 400
|
HV20 Sensor Problem
My HV20, which has performed flawlessly, started showing an alarming red vertical line that rendered all footage useless. It happened as I was shooting - no reason, out of the blue.
I am feeling that, while it's under warrenty, even if it fixes itself, that I should have this unit replaced - I can't have this happen again on an important shoot. Thoughts? Please save to disk (76MB QT File): http://hv20.teack.net/movies/HV20_Re...oblem_H264.mov
__________________
Mac + Canon HV20 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 202
|
The issue, Chapter 3....
To start, I was using my friend's account, Robert Ducon's, way more than he was until I've finally just got my own account recently. This HV20 sensor problem has always been with my camera, and now I have my own account, so I'll continue on here.
Quote:
I absolutely agree – this should have been dealt with early on as a replacement, and at this stage, with the amount of inconvenience it’s caused me, a very strong Canon HV20 supporter, I think it’s fair and reasonable that a swap for a new unit (with a new warranty) occurs. I spoke again with Canon last week, and they asked me to send in an e-mail with pictures of the problem. However, I * already * sent in an HDV tape with a very clear illustration of the problem when I originally sent the camera back! This is going in circles. To make matters worse, they took very near two months to ‘service’ my HV20 – I had been quoted 15 business days when I sent it away – and returned it with it still exhibiting the exact same problem, to the pixel. I scrambled at the 11th hour, to find a loaner to shoot my production which was to roll in a week. I’m a student, starting an entrepreneurial promotion business, and I had just enough cash to get it done. The HV20 was an integral part of the process a) it was my only camera b) a great camera for the money, and allowed me to invest in a Cinevate Brevis 35mm adapter and HD-capture card. The shoot was a success, and as far as I know, the only production shot with an HV20 capturing RAW 4:2:2 digital HD into a Mac Pro on a set with a Cinevate Brevis 35mm adapter: http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/FMW_HD_Frame_01.jpg http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/FMW_HD_Frame_03.jpg http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/FMW_HD_Frame_04.jpg http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/FMW_HD_Frame_06.jpg http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/FMW_HD_Frame_11.jpg I directed, D.O.P’d, produced and edited this, all without my core camera functioning, and with the limited resources I had, was lucky to get a replacement! I wrote a letter to Canon, as per a customer service person’s request for images showing proof of the problem: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Canon, This email is a follow-up to a conversation I had by phone with Canon technical support last week, February 21, 2008. My 'Canon HV20 A' is defective due to a manufacturer defect and I believe unit replacement is a fair request. I purchased it on March 30th, of 2007. Already in for a lengthy repair at Canon Calgary, the problem was not solved by any means. As I’ve stated in two conversations with technical phone support, I suspect that the imager system is defective, but whatever the nature of the problem is, the camera has become unusable for my profession. The problem is best described as vertical banding, a red/black line appearing intermittently on footage. It appears on all images produced by the camera: HDV recording, live out-put via HDMI/Component/Composite to a uncompressed HD capture card, and in-camera still image recording. My HV20 was sent by Canon dealers 'Victoria Camera Traders' to Canon Calgary on July 13, 2007, for repair after only 3 months of ownership. When it was returned to me from Canon Canada on August 23, 2007 - a seven week repair time - the problem was still present despite a 'replaced main circuit board and reprogram' as per the invoice. I sent an HDV tape with the camera to Canon to demonstrate recorded examples of the problem, so the issue has been well documented. I turned on the camera the next day, and the problem was clearly there, at the same intensity and location on the image as it has been. Before the problem, I had been very impressed with the quality of the image and the amount of features available with the camera. I have touted the HV20's abilities to individuals and non-profit societies in the Victoria BC region for the past year, and to filmmaking communities over the internet. I know that I have at least helped to influence purchases of the HV20 to at least 5 individuals within my filmmaking circle in Victoria. Lens and Shutter Victoria, Victoria Camera Service, and users of the website DVInfo.com, are all aware of this situation. Despite being an ardent supporter of Canon and the HV20, I have been unfairly inconvenienced by the inability to use a product that I paid $1500 for at the time of sale. Nearly two months of my warranty/and use of the camera are written off, as the camera wasn't repaired when it was out of my hands for the 2 months of 'repair', and since the date of return, I have been unable to use the unit. It has proven unreliable and defective and the footage is unusable with the professional results that are integral to my line of work. In order to meet deadlines I've had to borrow another HV20 to keep up with paying committments. In short, I have only had the use of this camera for approximately two months since I purchased it, April 2007 and June 2007. Beginning July 5th, 2007, the camera became unusable. It would be unreasonable for me to wait for another repair, especially if the outcome is the same: a near two months and no fix. If this happened, the camera would be returned outside of the warranty window and could result in an untreated unit. This would be unacceptable. Again, I am a supporter of Canon, but I expect this matter to be closed satisfactorily and in a fair manner with a new unit. Sincerely, - Christopher Ruffell I have included various still images taken with the camera's still function, as well as links to video downloads that soundly illustrate the problem. Original Full Size Still Images: http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/IMG_0289.JPG http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/IMG_0306.JPG http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/IMG_0307.JPG http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/IMG_0308.JPG 1280x720 Video Clip (76MB, 1:16 seconds) http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/HV20_Re...oblem_H264.mov *HDMI Uncompressed Captured 1920x1080 60i Apple Prores 422 HQ Clip (275 MB, 0:07 seconds) http://chrisruffell.com/hv20/HV20_42..._1920x1080.mov *NOTE: This was *not* a played back recording from an HDV tape: The uncompressed clip was a LIVE data stream captured from the HDMI port to a clean HDMI-to-HD-SDI convertor to a professional Decklink HD Extreme uncompressed video capture card - this is as close to a near to a fully digital, loss-less, uncompressed HV20 signal as one can imagine and is primarily intended for use with professional-grade cameras such as the XH-G1, Sony XDCAM/Cinealtas and the Panasonic Varicams. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 202
|
Canon's reply - not offering replacement
Quote:
I just got an e-mail back from Canon about no more than half an hour ago: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Valued Customer Thank you for your E-mail inquiry regarding your HV20. We have successfully received your images and video Mr. Ruffell. Upon inspection we do see the problem you have noted in your e-mail. We also feel this is a malfunction with the camcorder unit. As such, I recommend that your product be forwarded to an Canon Canada Factory Facility for inspection and review. Please include your name, address, daytime telephone number, copy of your bill of sale and a brief description of the symptom(s). Including sample images/video on CD/DVD would also assist the service facility. Upon receipt, the Service Facility will advise you accordingly. Please note that Canon Canada does not offer return, exchange or refund services. Products that are found to be malfunctioning are serviced and repaired to factory specification. If you have questions about your warranty please review the terms and conditions as outlined on your warranty card. Please find below, the name, address and telephone number of your nearest facility for your reference. CANON CANADA INC. 2828 16 ST NE CALGARY, AB, T2E7K7 Tel.: 403/219-5939 Should you require further assistance, please feel free to email us or visit our customer support website at http://www.canon.ca Sincerely, James D. Technical Support Representative Customer Information Centre Canon Canada Inc. ---------------------------------------------------- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
FWIW, Canon Canada warranty states "Defective parts will be exchanged for new parts or, at Canon Canada's option, comparable rebuilt parts for a period of ONE YEAR from the date of original purchase, except for a defective Video Head, which will be exchanged for a period of three months from the date of purchase. So, yes, they do offer "exchange" service, as per the warranty. Case closed - the camera is defective - replace with a new camera or, at Canon Canada's option, comparable rebuilt camera. With what you've had to go through, they really should replace with a brand new camera and stop screwing around. |
|
![]() |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|