|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 5th, 2007, 07:07 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
My HV20+Digital Camera Portable Rig
Hey everyone, I got a bit creative this past weekend when going to a friends informal wedding reception and wanted to be able to capture both video and still images (from my digital camera)...so I put together a portable rig that I affectionately call "The Silver Surfer" (yes, the movie commercial influenced the name - LOL!!!)
Here's some pics of the rig. http://vettaville.com/photos/CanonHV20/hv20_rig.jpg |
July 5th, 2007, 07:38 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 48
|
dude.
that's sweet. how much did it cost in parts?
|
July 5th, 2007, 08:04 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
The handle that the rig is mounted on (which is a camera flash arm) cost $17.00 and so I can still mount an external mic on it's shoe. This is actually a foldable arm that could be used for other configurations. Here's a pic of the handle arm. http://vettaville.com/photos/CanonHV...rig_handle.jpg The other good thing about this rig is that the screw holding the HV20 to the handle is also threaded, so you can still attach the entire rig to a mono/tripod. I brought my monopod with me but found I didn't need it.
The adapter atop the HV20 for the camera cost $12.00 The adapter mounted underside the digital camera I already had for years and have no idea how much it cost, but probably about $5.00 (would be an average guess). You wouldn't necessarily even need this adapter, you could attach the camera directly to the adapter that's atop the HV20, but I wanted the digital camera more to the left, so that's why I used this additional adapter. The hood on the HV20 is a used one one I found at a used camera store for $8.00 and is actually for a regular 35mm camera. It has 49mm threads and is attached to a UV filter which is attached to a 43mm-49mm adapter. I painted it silver to match the Canon. Also notice that it is small enough to not obstruct the auto-focus sensor. The downside to this hood is that I cannot attach any additional filters to the inside of it, so I'm still searching for the perfect hood that will not obstruct the auto-focus sensor and still allow me to attach a circular polarizer filter and adjust it with the lens hood on. Ultimately, I'm thinking of perhaps a large rectangular lens hood that completely covered the auto-focus sensor and flash and then just CUT OUT a hole for the sensor to see through. The rig is still a work in progress because I was in a rush to throw something together quickly for the wedding reception. All the men at the reception were impressed by how the rig looked and was put together, whereas the women kept trying to avoid being captured by both cameras. LOL! I would bet that most of these parts could be found for much, much less money but I had to buy something that afternoon, otherwise getting stuff online (and in advance) would be the cheaper way to go. Last edited by Nathan Shane; July 5th, 2007 at 08:49 AM. |
July 5th, 2007, 09:47 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Now that's my kind of thing, Nathan.
I assume you just didn't shoot the still out of the HV20 while filming because you wanted a bit higher definition stills and flash too,,,
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
July 5th, 2007, 11:10 AM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
I'm finally starting to understand how a larger megapixel image not only allows for greater detail capture but really gives you plenty of additional image sources to work from within the photo itself when doing pan/scan stuff (aka the Ken Burns fx). I've just started down that pathway of including still images alongside video into a finished DVD project. Of course, you've got to "actively think" about all the elements you want (or might want after-the-fact) to capture in the entire image if you're going to do some pan/scan stuff. For example, there were some photos I took at the reception that I had a primary subject in mind when I took the photo...but then when I started looking at the photos, I started seeing other subjects in a particular photo that I could use in the project (and did) rather than the original primary subject. But you start to loose resolution once you start zooming into a photo...so I got to get a higher megapixel camera that will allow me lots of room to pick and choose subject elements without loosing as much quality. |
|
July 5th, 2007, 09:25 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
July 5th, 2007, 11:49 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
I actually bought it from a camera store in town, Garland Camera, but I looked it up online and found the non-foldable version available at bhphoto.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...h_Bracket.html If you type in flash bracket and search the web, there are all kinds of great designs,such as the following: http://www.alzodigital.com/online_st...sh_bracket.htm |
July 6th, 2007, 01:54 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 178
|
Cool, thanks Nathan. Will check 'em out
|
July 6th, 2007, 11:49 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 48
|
It never occurred to me to use flash handle/arms on a video camera. I am certainly going to grab one now for mine. Great inexpensive solution to offset the awkward shape of it!
peace|dewde http://dewde.com |
July 6th, 2007, 02:36 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: paris
Posts: 289
|
Okay. Where did you find it?
Quote:
Merci! Last edited by Mathieu Kassovitz; July 7th, 2007 at 12:42 AM. |
|
July 6th, 2007, 02:51 PM | #11 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
I originally was just going to get the non-foldable arm, but decided that since the foldable one has the additional tapped-screwhole up by the flash shoe bracket that it might could come in handy for attaching something else in the future as I think of things to add. The next thing to add really would be mounting the HV20's remote control (with fiber-optic cable) like others have already done here in the forum. I'm sure you can find the foldable version of the arm I posted a link to, I just didn't have time to search online and find one myself to point others to a specific website. |
|
July 6th, 2007, 02:58 PM | #12 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
Last edited by Nathan Shane; July 6th, 2007 at 05:13 PM. |
|
July 7th, 2007, 02:45 AM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: paris
Posts: 289
|
Quote:
Merci! |
|
July 8th, 2007, 08:57 PM | #14 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 24
|
Nathan...thanks for the info...I'm going to stop by Garland camera next time I'm in the area.
|
July 9th, 2007, 06:18 AM | #15 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Addison, Texas
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
I've had a 43mm to 49mm step up adapter on my HV20 and at Garland camera was able to find a used HOYA 49mm to 55mm adapter they sold me for $1.00 and a used HOYA 55mm Circular Polarizer for $5.00, you can't beat those kinds of prices. |
|
| ||||||
|
|