What "free" 24p workflow for Windows users?

David Newman · May 27th, 2007, 09:26 AM

Yes. But try both NEO HDV and Aspect HD first, to see what you prefer.

Mike Dulay · May 27th, 2007, 09:35 AM

Steve, not sure if it's my imagination but the new 1.0.0.15 of the standalone process appears to run VirtualDubMod faster for the same codec settings (using WMV9 Lossy). I see you've appended some new lines to the syl file used for re-encode, are those performance tweaks?

Dennis Wood · May 27th, 2007, 10:16 AM

Steve, your .avs file may be blocked (because of the extension) by the web server itself. Try zipping it. If you need bandwidth (for downloads etc.) let me know and we'll set you up. I posted a link to your page over at dvxuser so folks there could have a look. Once set up, the standalone .exe is, IMHO, the easiest method to deal with HV20 pulldown removal I've seen yet. Having the .xml template that can be saved is a nice touch.

Steve Szudzik · May 27th, 2007, 11:06 AM

Mike, are there new lines there for the .syl? When I made the template file conversion, I just write out the previously set defaults from my resource file into the new xml file. Those should be the same as they were before. At least I don't remember changing them! It's good to hear that it might be faster though.

Dennis, yes, it does seem like my IIS server is preventing those extensions for external machines. I renamed it to template.avs.txt and then it downloads just fine. I'm not too worried about bandwidth for this little app but I did go ahead and zip it up along with the avs file. I'll update the documentation shortly to point at the new zip file...

--Steve

May 27th, 2007, 09:26 AM	#46
David Newman CTO, CineForm Inc. Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California Posts: 8,095	Yes. But try both NEO HDV and Aspect HD first, to see what you prefer. __________________ David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman

May 27th, 2007, 09:35 AM	#47
Mike Dulay Major Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Somerville, NJ Posts: 304	1.0.0.15 of standlone Steve, not sure if it's my imagination but the new 1.0.0.15 of the standalone process appears to run VirtualDubMod faster for the same codec settings (using WMV9 Lossy). I see you've appended some new lines to the syl file used for re-encode, are those performance tweaks? __________________ DIY, 35mm, HV20: http://www.primitivebuteffective.net

May 27th, 2007, 10:16 AM	#48
Dennis Wood Major Player Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 916	Steve, your .avs file may be blocked (because of the extension) by the web server itself. Try zipping it. If you need bandwidth (for downloads etc.) let me know and we'll set you up. I posted a link to your page over at dvxuser so folks there could have a look. Once set up, the standalone .exe is, IMHO, the easiest method to deal with HV20 pulldown removal I've seen yet. Having the .xml template that can be saved is a nice touch.

May 27th, 2007, 11:06 AM	#49
Steve Szudzik Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Sammamish, WA Posts: 103	Mike, are there new lines there for the .syl? When I made the template file conversion, I just write out the previously set defaults from my resource file into the new xml file. Those should be the same as they were before. At least I don't remember changing them! It's good to hear that it might be faster though. Dennis, yes, it does seem like my IIS server is preventing those extensions for external machines. I renamed it to template.avs.txt and then it downloads just fine. I'm not too worried about bandwidth for this little app but I did go ahead and zip it up along with the avs file. I'll update the documentation shortly to point at the new zip file... --Steve