|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 23rd, 2007, 05:10 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 62
|
Intensity doesn't support HV20
Has anyone here heard anything official from BlackMagic when/if the HV20 will be supported? I'm starting to wonder if I should return the card and HDMI cables I bought while I still can...
|
April 23rd, 2007, 08:01 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 440
|
Blackmagic told me they have not tested the camera yet, not very official but I'm sure they wouldn't mind me passing that along. The theory is that it is an HDCP issue, perhaps Canon has HDCP turned on and that's why it will only capture to 480i. Somehow I don't think it's going to work anytime soon. Bummer.
|
April 23rd, 2007, 08:25 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 400
|
What/why would Canon turn HDCP on (if this is what's causing it, in theory)? To either:
a) Prevent people from using this camera instead of buying the XL H1 OR b) To allow the footage to play on an HDCP complient system? (I don't know enough about HDCP at all.. this is a guess..) OR c) Other reasons?
__________________
Mac + Canon HV20 |
April 23rd, 2007, 10:41 PM | #4 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24th, 2007, 06:45 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24th, 2007, 07:50 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
We could always buy the Intensity Pro card which is $100.00 more but also captures from component. Until the HDMI thing gets fixed you could capture via component for almost the same level of quality. Having component may also be nice if you have any older HDV cameras or want to capture from older HD devices.
|
April 24th, 2007, 08:10 AM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Page 69 "Correct operations cannot be guaranteed when connecting the camcorder to DVI monitors." And more ominous: "Some HDTV's have their HDCP digital content protection configured so as not to allow the playback of personal content (video recorded for personal uses). If you cannot play back the video recorded with this camcorder on your HDTV using the HDMI connection, try connecting the camcorder using the video component connection -1connection type- instead." |
|
April 24th, 2007, 08:18 AM | #8 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Quote:
|
|
April 24th, 2007, 09:19 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 62
|
Harm, how is capturing a live HDMI feed and avoiding HDV compression not a difference? If you mean capturing footage already recorded to tape then yes, you are correct, there is no difference. But that's not why people want this card and that's not how this card is being marketed. That's not what the Intensity is about.
|
April 24th, 2007, 09:45 AM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Derek,
I just made one assumption too much, assuming you are using a camera, that is a lightweight, highly mobile one and not directly a studio camera in the field, instead of in a studio. I have seen so many posts about people assuming that the HDMI connection 'by definition' means uncompressed 4:2:2 streams, that I guessed wrong. You are absolutely correct for studio work, where you can lug your workstation, keyboard and monitor to attach to your camera, even if you have no real maneuverability with the short HDMI cable, you benefit from the HDMI connection. Just out of curiosity, how - in practical terms - would you weigh that advantage of unplugging all connections on your workstation, load it, including monitor, keyboard, external raid array, etc. in your car, drive to a studio 50 miles away, set it all up again, connect it to a 10 feet HDMI cable and shoot with this camera, losing all mobility? After the shoot you have to pack it all again, drive back and re-install your workstation. This does not make much sense to me. It does make sense if you have a studio with your workstation permanently installed. Please enlighten me. Thanks. |
April 24th, 2007, 10:03 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 62
|
Honestly, I'm not sure why someone would want to go through all that trouble you've described. I guess it could be done if the person was willing to put a little effort into it. Personally, my studio is in my home, so I don't have to move any of my equipment. So mobility isn't really an issue for me. If I want to shoot outdoors, I shoot to tape.
|
April 24th, 2007, 10:09 AM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Derek, that clears it up. Thanks. Hope that Cineform will shortly update their drivers.
|
April 24th, 2007, 12:36 PM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Intensity Pro sounds like a pretty good deal though. |
|
April 24th, 2007, 09:38 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Munich Germany
Posts: 34
|
There is no HDCP encryption on the HV20 HDMI output. If the HDMI handshake with the target device succeeds, the camera generates an unencrypted 1080i YCrCb (444) signal in HDV mode or 480i (576i) in DV mode. If not, the output defaults to DVI RGB 480p (576p). BM supports RGB (444) or YCrCb (422) only.
Btw: The HD-Connect MI HDMI to SDI converter now operates correctly with the HV20 (FW 1.37). |
April 25th, 2007, 03:18 AM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
I wanted a BM Intensity card to cap HV20 style before-hdv compression and gaming footage from PlayStaion 3's HDMI port. But i can cap neither! The PS3 doesnt even turn "off" CP when its in the menu's and games and turn it on for just movies (which would be fine!). #$%$#% :(
__________________
Welcome... to the real world! |
|
| ||||||
|
|