|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 25th, 2007, 05:26 PM | #91 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 24
|
I question the veracity of the original post. To be blunt, I think it's a story written to discredit the camera right out of the shoot. I might start to believe it if this is still a viable topic in a few months. I appreciate those who gave sincere replys.
An internet BB 'drive-by'. |
March 25th, 2007, 05:47 PM | #92 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Well I think it's obvious that the title of the thread should be changed. No doubt the original poster returned the HV20 after one hour, but the reason was not "due to bad autofocus design." It was instead perhaps due to unrealistic expectations or unfamiliarity with how the camcorder is designed to operate. I'll come up with some suitable revision for a more appropriate thread title.
|
March 25th, 2007, 07:30 PM | #93 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
I think that would be appropriate, all things considered. Mike |
|
March 25th, 2007, 08:48 PM | #94 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
I await your modification. See you at NAB. Mike
__________________
Chapter one, line one. The BH. |
|
March 25th, 2007, 09:37 PM | #95 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Thread title changed from "Returning HV20 after 1 hour due to bad autofocus design" to "Returning HV20 after 1 hour." We know for a fact that the "Returning HV20 after 1 hour" part is true. The "bad autofocus design" part is an obfuscation. There is nothing wrong with the autofocus design on the HV20, and it is highly unlikely that there was anything at all wrong with this particular HV20. Hope this helps,
|
March 25th, 2007, 09:42 PM | #96 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
I'll be happy to post some footage as well. If anyone wants to beat me to the "really low light footage" please feel free. ;) Cheers, Mike |
|
March 26th, 2007, 06:40 AM | #97 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
Quote:
|
|
March 26th, 2007, 02:34 PM | #98 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 426
|
Mine 'seemed' to have this exact same focus problem for about two minutes. I know cameras don't have a tabula rasa type brain but honestly . . . I think the camera somehow adjusted its ability to focus properly. For those who have an HV20 coming I'd be curious if you have the same experience.
|
March 26th, 2007, 03:04 PM | #99 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
HVX-20's got the stealth mojo
I tell ya, I was so impressed with this footage from the HV20 with the Brevis adapter http://www.cinevate.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=479 that I'm thinking I gots to get me one o' these. I could make great use of the 24p cinema mode. I imagine myself riding the crouded trains of Manhattan, having the talent do their thing while I shoot way without anyone even noticing I'm carrying a camera in my inconspicuous little bag. To quote our friend from the Brevis forum the HV-20 "got the 'stealth' mojo working hard"
P.S: strike the "X"...lol
__________________
I will be KING! |
March 26th, 2007, 07:28 PM | #100 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
If anyone wondering, Camcorderinfo’s review of the HV20 is up and they claim that the auto focusing is indeed better than the HC7’s.
If only I have spent more than a few minutes trying out the Canon HV20 I would have found out if the auto focus is better than the Panasonic AG-HSC1U that I tried for about an hour. |
March 27th, 2007, 11:53 AM | #101 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 49
|
Can someone please change the title of this thread?
I received a replacement HV20 from BestBuy this morning. Strangely, this is the first time that I've been asked to sign on the driver's electronic pad. Anyway, I immediatey took it out and attached the battery. (yes, I know I should have charged it first, but I only had a few minutes before I had to leave the house) WOW! This HV20 definitely die NOT have any problem with autofocus. I aimed it at the same objects under the same light.(all done on a tripod) No problemo! I guess the first HV20 that I returned must have been a randon defective unit.... perhaps I should look into BestBuy's 4-year service plan... :) |
March 27th, 2007, 12:19 PM | #102 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
Leila, or it just could have been what was explained quite well here...
Quote:
|
|
March 27th, 2007, 01:47 PM | #103 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 201
|
Manual focus/ manual exposure/ ext mic
Manual focus/ manual exposure/ ext mic
Has anyone tried any of these features? |
March 27th, 2007, 02:24 PM | #104 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 288
|
manula focus, exposure and external mic
I have tried using these features. Manual focus and exposure functions work quite well. It's fun to us Av mode and see how changing the aperture affects depth of field.
Sadly, the Rode Videomic is picking up the whine of the camera, even when I attach it to a bracket off to the side of the camera. The Videomic has a high pass filter switch, but even selecting this does not filter out the noticeable whine of the camera. I can eliminate this by cranking down the mic sensitivity, but I have to lower the input volume too much to do so. |
March 27th, 2007, 03:13 PM | #105 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
Dino |
|
| ||||||
|
|