|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 31st, 2007, 08:41 PM
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Trivandrum India
Posts: 16
|
Waiting for footage
Waiting for some footage of HV20. Hope someone gets hold of this cam and uploads some footage.
Rgrds |
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:14 PM
|
#2 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Hi Susan, you're in for a little bit of a wait... the HV20 won't be available for about two months yet.
|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:16 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:45 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
http://usa.canon.com/app/html/See_Th.../hd_cmos.shtml |
|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:51 PM
|
#5 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Trivandrum India
Posts: 16
|
That was HV10 footage. I am looking for hv20 footage, which I hope some Japanese sites, bring that up, from a pre-release model.
|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:54 PM
|
#6 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
I'm pretty sure that the HV20 is going to become my first camera! I can't wait to get my hands on this thing...
|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:56 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
Don't expect the HV20 footage to look that different... Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 09:57 PM
|
#8 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Both cameras use the exact same CMOS chip and image processor. Even their lens properties are the same. There won't be any difference between the two as far as the video is concerned... the readily available HV10 clip from Canon will give you a clear indication of what the HV20 will do.
The only "unknown" at this point is the 24p mode. Expect some downloadable video later on as we get closer to April. Splitting these posts out as a separate thread... |
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2007, 10:15 PM
|
#9 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Provo, Utah
Posts: 14
|
I thought I saw something about the HV20 having a slightly lower lux rating for night-time shooting, and lower noise overall, than the HV10.
|
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2007, 12:22 AM
|
#10 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
ok then, imagine HV10 footage slightly brighter with slightly less noise.
|
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2007, 08:26 AM
|
#11 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Aprilia
Posts: 12
|
What about high motion scenes? I read on this forum that the HV10 was poor in these situations compared to the HC3 (wich also has the rolling shutter problem)
|
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2007, 08:38 AM
|
#12 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
I don't know why, but I want it. Canon please stop.
|
|
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2007, 12:19 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
__________________
Chapter one, line one. The BH. |
|
|
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2007, 06:16 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
Quote:
The decision to change the shape was done by their marketing people. It appears consumers want the aformentioned shape over the vertical style. Personally, the vertical style fits my cycling and touring lifestyle. Nice and flat, small and compact. That was the reason I sold my HC-1. Too bulky for my travel purposes.
__________________
Lou Bruno |
|
|
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2007, 08:53 PM
|
#15 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 69
|
i was thinking it would play closer to the PQ of a XHA1.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
