|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 25th, 2006, 01:30 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York NY
Posts: 35
|
HV10 as deck and second camera
I will be doing a film that I want to shoot in Hi Def w/a Canon A1. I’d love to get some feed back on the HV10 both as a deck and back up cam.
1) It has come up in these forums that the HV10 can be used as an input deck for any flavor of A1: 60i, 24p, 30p. I need some reassurance on that. 2) If I use the HV10 as a second camera. Can I convert the image to 24p or 30p in Post, let’s say FCP and how complicated will that be? What will I have to buy, and how much quality will I lose?
__________________
mg |
November 25th, 2006, 07:08 PM | #2 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
FCP will de-interlace by itself without the need for additional software, although depending on your needs and your source material 3 party de-interlacers like 'Magic Bullet' may be worth a look. |
|||
November 26th, 2006, 10:19 AM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,015
|
http://www.usa.canon.com/app/html/HD...ications.shtml
see the section "supported playback modes" i use mine as a deck for my FX-1 tapes, and it does a good job....i don't own an XH cam yet, but i feel confident it will work fine. this little camera is an excellent piece of equipment. |
November 28th, 2006, 08:43 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York NY
Posts: 35
|
Thank you!
Thanks, Lee and Meyrem, a short thread but all I needed to know.
MG
__________________
mg |
November 28th, 2006, 08:47 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York NY
Posts: 35
|
Meryem
Sorry, Meryem for the misspell!
__________________
mg |
November 28th, 2006, 09:59 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 376
|
It is worth noting that in scenes where there is very little or very slow movement (for instance a slow pan across some landscape scenery) you may not need to de-interlace at all, it is only if interlacing becomes apparent that you might want to de-interlace to match the look of other progresseive footage you may have.
|
November 28th, 2006, 11:10 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York NY
Posts: 35
|
I so plan to combine the shots with material shot on the Canon XHA1.
(Which raises the question do I want to shoot on Progressive (24F) at all??? If I can leave that decision to Post w/out loss in quality? I'll bring that up in XH A1 forum.) I really plan to push the HV10. Using it at lower shutter speeds and/or frame rates to shoot in subway stations. I don't want to open up that unrelenting issue--which tape stock. I think I will convert to Panasonic hi-def tapes on both cams.
__________________
mg |
November 28th, 2006, 05:12 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
Some of the better de-interlacing software is very good (magic bullet etc) at producing near loss free progressive frames from an interlaced image. Futher down the food chain you have motion detection de-interlacing - MPEG Streamclip, After Effects etc etc. Then simple interpolation (which can still look great) and finally simple field doubling which loses half of your vertical resolution. |
|
| ||||||
|
|