|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 29th, 2007, 12:08 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rainham, Kent, UK
Posts: 69
|
Like I said, the trick is to lock the aperture with the camera zoomed out fully. If you lock the aperture with the camera zoomed in at all, you can't get a fully open iris. This is straight out of my camera (it's the Num Lock light on my keyboard):
|
September 29th, 2007, 06:19 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 400
|
I stand corrected! Now that I think of it, I've gotten an image similar to that too, but the focus was so far out that it was just pretty colours (shot at night, street lights, etc).
__________________
Mac + Canon HV20 |
September 30th, 2007, 06:06 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 101
|
Hi Steve&Robert,
thanks voor 'zooming in' on my relatively OT statement there. Helps me a lot! Pieter (ps - and I learned a new word: bokeh ;) |
October 18th, 2007, 08:54 AM | #19 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pahrump, NV
Posts: 24
|
I too would love to be able to do DOF effects more naturally, but it costs so dang much. In a short movie I made (before buying my HV20) I did the green screen trick. I think it looks alright.
Here's a link, not to my movie but a short demo of some of the effects in my movie. You'll see one is a DOF effect using green screen. I don't think it looks half bad. http://youtube.com/watch?v=AXec4XjmtHE |
October 24th, 2007, 09:49 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 107
|
For anyone who gets hung up on depth of field, I urge you to see Orson Welles's Touch of Evil.
|
October 25th, 2007, 12:30 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 209
|
Zooming in does not produce shallower DOF if the subject takes up the same portion of the screen.
|
October 25th, 2007, 07:24 AM | #22 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Actually yes, technically this is indeed true. Zooming in will in fact produce a shallower depth of field. However this technique for decreasing depth of field is not all that useful because the subject size obviously changes as focal length changes. For a full explanation, see our definitive article "The Ultimate Depth-of-Field Skinny" by Jeff Donald, located at http://www.dvinfo.net/articles/optics/dofskinny.php -- hope this helps,
|
October 25th, 2007, 10:13 PM | #23 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
You are both correct.
Quote:
Quote:
It's important to note the difference, because if a shot is framed the same way at wide angle and telephoto, the telephoto shot will yeild more diffuse background blur due to magnification, even though the DoF is the same. |
||
November 19th, 2007, 11:53 AM | #24 |
Tourist
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 3
|
DOF Test
I did a quick test on DOF for the HV 20. You can view it here:
http://www.vimeo.com/393169 Make sure to select Full Screen to see detail. Hope it helps. Brad |
November 19th, 2007, 03:53 PM | #25 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 107
|
Hey, Brad, thanks for the DOF test on the HV20. The image is gorgeous.
I'm curious -- are you the same Brad Mirman who wrote Resurrection? One of the creepiest serial killer movies of all time. rgb |
| ||||||
|
|