|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 14th, 2008, 01:12 AM | #31 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
HDV is simply is not engineered to work at arbitrary frame-rates and arbitrary bit-rates. Go with the ProRes workflow. And don't be tempted to scale the frame up or down. Compressor does a bad job of scaling. |
|
May 14th, 2008, 01:10 PM | #32 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central, OH
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
And I don't know what you mean by saying HDV isn't engineered to work at arbitrary frame rates either. These frame rates aren't arbitrary. I'm not trying to use 19.563 fps for goodness sake. HDV footage can be captured directly into FCP using 60i or 24p. If this was shot at 24p with the A1, you could use FCPs 24p settings, but since the HV20 has an irregular cadence, you have to use 60i. If you wanted to, you could leave it in 60i and edit and export it that way as well. The only thing that's happening to the frames after using Compressor is that all the interlaced frames are fixed. I've watched the footage, frame by frame, counting as items move in and out of the shot, there's nothing odd happening here at all. I'm not scaling anything. Why would I? |
|
May 15th, 2008, 03:42 AM | #33 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Consequently the data-rate is fixed. The frame rates are fixed and the resolutions are fixed. None of these factors can be changed without potentially breaking HDV. Compressor might let you make the change. But there is no guarantee that any other software or hardware will work with it. In short, if you change the frame rate - it ceases to be true HDV. Use ProRes422. That's what it is for. Using HDV is a bad idea for quality reasons too. |
|
May 17th, 2008, 01:23 PM | #34 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central, OH
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
Give me a break. The footage was shot in HDV and it's still in HDV. There was no reason for me to convert it to ProRes422 just to reverse telecine it back to 24p |
|
May 17th, 2008, 06:07 PM | #35 | ||
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
HDV is not designed to do this. HDV is a horrible technical compromise. Not designed for editing. Not designed for anything other than squeezing a HDTV image onto a DV bitstream. The fact that Final Cut falls over trying to do this confirms this. Quote:
2....The fact that it cannot possibly work. 3... The fact that it does not work. Other than that, there is no reason whatsoever. |
||
December 10th, 2008, 03:07 PM | #36 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 161
|
I'm bringing this thread back to life with a quick question.
When I inverse telecine with JES using the posted workflows, i prefer to output an AIC, instead of photo-jpeg file. When I import the file into FCP though, and set up a sequence and edit the sequence settings to accept said AIC file, it still wants me to render everytime, should this be happening?? Others had stated that the file would not need to be redered after import and adding to timeline. What am I doing wrong here?? |
December 11th, 2008, 08:42 AM | #37 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 161
|
ok, so I found what was wrong...I neglected to change my editing timebase to 23.98 when setting up my sequence in FCP..oops..but it's working great now!!!
|
| ||||||
|
|