|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 2nd, 2008, 06:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Tourist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 2
|
HG10 or HV20...which one and why?
After lots of reading of reviews I've come down to either the Canon HG10 or HV20. We will be going on a multi-year boat trip and want to shoot a documentary style story about our trip. Any comments on which unit you would select and why? I'm leaning towards the HV20 because I think it might be a easier (cheaper) format to save the multiple hours of video as apposed to having to carry multiple hard drives to save all the hrs of footage.
Thanks |
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2008, 12:55 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 348
|
HV20, better quality. HG10 is more convenient, but not better looking.
|
|
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2008, 03:12 AM
|
#3 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
And the HV30 is even better looking.
|
|
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2008, 02:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 300
|
I like the hv20, as much as people knock tapes, they're pretty easy when you're in the field. and the quality is better. and with tape you just pop in a new one immediately, instead of having to dump the footage to a computer at ~realtime.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
