|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 10th, 2008, 02:06 AM | #46 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
Gosh i wish there were a few more additions to the HV30. Does anyone think they will give us proper metadata (or stream info) to show 24/25/30p flags etc? Woudlnt be to bad if this little gem of an update made it in. Though still not worth upgrading for 99.5% of HV20 owners.
__________________
Welcome... to the real world! |
|
January 10th, 2008, 10:02 AM | #47 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
No change here, sorry (by the way pulldown flags are not needed for 25P or 30P).
|
January 10th, 2008, 11:28 AM | #48 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 658
|
Yeah,
but I just purchased my HV20. So I returned it to B&H and will wait for the HV30 for me the better LCD (as I am using this with a 35mm adapter) is great. 30p is nice too. enough of a reason to wait for a month |
January 13th, 2008, 09:57 PM | #49 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 7
|
Improvement...
Who are these yo-yos who say "30p is of little use to pros"? MANY "Pros" think 30p actually looks better than 24p. And no problem with judder. I might pick up one of these just for the 30p. Some of you have obviously been blinded by the "24p" hype. That's all it is folks... hype. Shallow DOF has MUCH more to do with your heralded "film look" than frame rate.
When one of you gets the HV30... do a little test between 24p and 30p for the shutterbugs here.. then be honest with yourself regarding which one actually looks better. |
January 13th, 2008, 10:58 PM | #50 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 167
|
24p Question
Will the final product of shooting at 30p, importing to NLE and then exporting as a 24p file give the same film effect as the final product of shooting at 24p, removing pull-down, importing to NLE and then exporting as 24p? The reason I am asking is the removal of pulldown procedure is time-consuming (especially when there are no flags), and I was wondering whether one can achieve the same film effect simply by reducing the number of frames per second to 24 during export of a footage already shot and captured at 30 fps?
P. |
January 13th, 2008, 11:44 PM | #51 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 348
|
It won't look the same because the shutter speed used by the camera is different.
|
January 14th, 2008, 03:48 AM | #52 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
The 30p mode would be great for the web productions that I create and the black color is much cooler, but I still don't know if that justifies the extra 300 bucks.
__________________
http://www.jamesrichardson.net |
|
January 14th, 2008, 01:59 PM | #53 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
Back to my question, will reducing the number of frames per second from 30 to 24 during export by eliminating 6 frames give you the same effect of film look compared to getting 24 frames from start? P. |
|
January 14th, 2008, 02:58 PM | #54 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
I have actually shot 60i footage on my FX1, and taken the captured files into Cineform's HDLink, doing pulldown removal to get 24p in the Conversion. David Newman at Cineform says you do lose resolution, but the resulting footage looked pretty good to me.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
January 14th, 2008, 07:39 PM | #55 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 132
|
At least they didn't downgrade it, and they didn't raise the price on it... and black is way cooler IMO.
Seems like by coming out with a slightly upgraded version for less money, we can continue to capture outstanding video in the sub 1k range for a long time to come. Any links to an official spec sheet anywhere? |
January 14th, 2008, 08:19 PM | #56 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 12:07 PM | #57 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bristol, CT. USA
Posts: 54
|
Is there any way to get 30p out the HV20 using 60i mode??
If so how, I'm assuming post processing??? |
January 15th, 2008, 01:42 PM | #58 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 30
|
Yes you can, rather simply. It's called deinterlacing.
60i -> 30p = deinterlacing 60i -> 60p = bob deinterlacing I'm constantly dismayed at the laughable quality of most deinterlacing algorithms in popular pro software. AviSynth for the win in this department. MCBob is kind of ridiculous, but very slow. Magic Bullet isn't bad, but AviSynth is better - and free! :) If you're shooting 60i with the HV20 (or any HDV camera) it's recording 60i. If you're shooting 24p, it's recording 60i - but the 60i has pulldown flags. Removing these flags (with a competent NLE or AviSynth) recovers the actual 24p that the sensors captured. There is no deinterlacing required - it's called field matching. Fields get moved around and so forth, but there's no interpolation performed. Hence it's a lossless process. Deinterlacing is not lossless. I'm not sure how the HV20 captures its images, if it performs its own internal (probably bad) deinterlacing, or if it actually acquires progressive images. I'm sure someone here knows ;) ~MiSfit |
January 16th, 2008, 03:00 AM | #59 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 57
|
From 24p standpoint 30p itself doesn't interests me that much but as a slow-mo shooting mode it's an excellent option. 30 -> 24 slow down will be great for subtler slowmo shots, and of course it doesn't lose vertical resolution.
HV30 is understandably a very conservative upgrade. Regardless of actual cost of adding more feature, I think Canon doesn't want to make their now 'vixia' line of cameras any more pro-friendly than they are now ;) Derek, HV20 (and 30) captures image progressively for 24p, which is why it garnered so much interest since announcement. |
January 16th, 2008, 04:19 AM | #60 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Nice upgrade Canon, and kept well away from the XH-A1 by sticking with the rather slow (F/1.8) rather short (10x) and rather 'dull' focal lengths that immediately cry out for a wide-angle converter. But like other posters have said - the deserved sales success of this little wonder-cam show that Canon are a real pin-prick in Sony's side. All power to them.
tom. |
| ||||||
|
|