|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 3rd, 2007, 07:04 PM
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
Is it possible to record to tape at the same time? It would be interesting to see the same shot both ways, especially a scene with intense color (like the red shirt of your first post or the blue car I've attached) to compare 4:2:2 with 4:2:0 subsampling.
|
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2007, 07:28 PM
|
#17 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 40
|
It is an exact remark. I will make an effort do it in the near time.
(you did a very large magnification:) |
|
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2007, 07:44 PM
|
#18 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
Yeah, it's a 200% enlargement. Just so that it is easy to point out the visible artifacts of 4:2:2 sub-sampling. (It should be much better than HDV's 4:2:0 sampling when recorded to tape.)
|
|
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2007, 07:56 PM
|
#19 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 40
|
It very strange, but they are not written down simultaneously on tape and in a file, but I will try...
|
|
|
|
|
October 4th, 2007, 06:56 AM
|
#20 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 19
|
Svyatoslav, thanks for your contribution, I'm following this thread with plenty of interest.
Best regards |
|
|
|
|
October 4th, 2007, 08:16 AM
|
#21 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
Svyatoslav,
Are you sure? I don't have a way to record HDMI, but I have monitored HDMI and recorded at the same time. The camera shouldn't care. |
|
|
|
|
October 4th, 2007, 11:13 AM
|
#22 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 40
|
Certainly. I had because of synchronously under a management from a computer.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
