|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 13th, 2007, 10:22 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 61
|
Recording external audio source
Hi,
I connected a Roland keyboard to the HV20 using mini-phone plug (from RCA outs). I get a low hum immediately so I had to turn on MIC ATT. However I notice a gate effect after that meaning I hear the volume being capped frequently. I tried changing the volume but same effect (and low quality). Any idea if this is normal?I'm sure the audio signal is fine since when I hook it up to PC speakers it sounds just perfect. Strange that I need to turn MIC ATT in the first place. Thanks Luc |
August 13th, 2007, 11:00 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 293
|
Luc - I'm not a musician nor am I familiar with that keyboard. But check if there is a line/mic switch on the keyboard output and set it to "mic". A "line" setting is a hotter signal which may cause what you are experiencing. Alternatively, get a cheap mixer (Bheringer makes some nice ones). That will allow you to set your levels, mix multiple sources and output a nice signal to your camera.
__________________
Check out my videos here: http://www.youtube.com/24Peter |
August 13th, 2007, 11:17 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
|
In addition to the line versus mic issue, you could be creating a ground-loop if your camera is plugged into the power adapter.
Try running the camera using battery-only to see if the hum goes away.
__________________
"The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson |
August 13th, 2007, 01:21 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 61
|
That was it! Using the battery it works just fine now, never have thought that could be the problem.
|
August 13th, 2007, 08:34 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
|
Since it looks like it might be a ground-loop problem, some other things to try:
- If they aren't already, plug the Roland and Canon power cables into the same outlet/power-bar. This will cut down the likelihood that they're connected the long way through the power infrastructure. - If that doesn't help, try flipping one of the power plugs around - might be difficult if your power cables are keyed (one prong's wider than the other) and/or the Roland has three prongs. It's not uncommon for cheap power-bars to have flipped phases between sockets. - If none of the above works, but the Roland does have TRS or XLR balanced outputs, you could drop by your local pro-audio/music store and pick up a proper pair of cables to connect the balanced outputs to the HV20's unbalanced mic inputs.
__________________
"The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson |
August 13th, 2007, 09:51 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Niagara, Ontario
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
I had this same issue, but with a rode-video mic. The video mic uses a battery, but when I had it plugged in through a 15m extention cable to the camera, i heard a buzz sound. If I unplugged the power cable from the camera went away. If i removed the 15m extention cable, it removed the buzz completely, regardless whether the camera was plugged in or not. The problem here though is that I will need to have the camera plugged in and still use a the rode videomic on a boom pole. What will I do here? |
|
August 13th, 2007, 10:42 PM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
In my case I had both the Roland and Canon plugged in the same outlet. I do have an extended battery which lasts many hours so no problem. By the way the HV20 video is on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE6qm4aCaaY (actually that's the one that has some gate issues but on youtube you lose anyway most of the quality so you won't notice much). |
|
August 14th, 2007, 06:52 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
|
Jay, 15m is pretty long for an unbalanced cable - that's one long antenna! You're probably picking up all kinds of 60Hz and other electrical noise along the length. If you're committed to using that mic (is this the one?) for recording audio, definitely try a shorter cable. If shorter isn't an option, wireless may be the only way to keep the mic-to-transmitter and receiver-to-camera connections short.
That said, you might be able to pick up something like a Zoom H4 for the same price as a wireless mic kit. Then you can put the Rode back on your camera to capture reference/background audio and capture higher-res audio at the source with the H4. You then have the option to use TRS/XLR balanced connections to better quality mics and sources, recording at higher bit-rates on the H4. So many ways to spend more money. ;-)
__________________
"The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson |
August 14th, 2007, 08:39 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 129
|
I'm not an audio expert nor am I familiar with the Rode Mic but if you could connect the mic via an xlr balanced cable & get you a Beachtek or XLR Pro adaptor at the camera end, I would think you would eleminate the hum. If not, pick up a decent XLR mic for the boom.
|
August 14th, 2007, 10:37 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
|
The gottcha is that both the Rode mic and HV20 are unbalanced stereo I/O. The XLR ground-lifting trick won't work because neither side can source or sink a differential balanced signal.
Switching to a different mic would at least let you pick something that works.
__________________
"The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson |
August 14th, 2007, 01:07 PM | #11 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 01:34 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 83
|
It may be worth noting that the XLR Pro has two different grounding settings while the beachtek only has one. That might be relevant.
I was thinking about trying the Rode Video Mic -> rodeo mini to XLR Adapter -> XLR cable -> XLR to mini converter box -> camera chain with my GL2 some time. Bummer if that doesn't provide any more protection from interference than just using unbalanced mini audio cable. Shayne Weyker http://weykervideo.com |
August 14th, 2007, 02:39 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
|
Ah, good. Since the Beachtek converts to a balanced/differential signal for the long-haul it should be ok... And looking at BHPhoto, a Zoom H4 does cost less than many of the Beachtek options.
If I were making the decision, I'd opt for the H4 field-recorder approach because you're only going to get 12/16-bit lossy-compressed audio out of an HV20 recording to HDV.
__________________
"The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson |
August 14th, 2007, 06:51 PM | #14 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
I know what you mean about the sound. I don't know whether it's my Pinnacle doing it but when I capture my video it separates the audio from the video. I haven't figured what it's doing but the capture folder winds up with two identical size wav files. I think the audio sounds better when I play the wav files than it does after I've outputed to a DVD format. Incidentally in the output selection the audio is designated as mpeg1. Does that make sense. It offers to do Dolby Stereo which I haven't tried because I'm not sure if that will limit the client to need dolby in order to hear the audio. Audio is just about as important to me as the video so I need to keep working at improving my audio. I think they really screwed up by limiting the audio quality in the HDV specification in order to still fit an hour of HDV on a minidv tape. I wonder if a direct to disk solution would improve the audio even though I'm still going to render to DVD and not HD DVD for the time being? If it does, it certainly would be an expensive and time consuming way of improving audio capture. I guess I'll get me an H4 and get my hands dirty in post op to see. I was ok with the audio capture in standard DV even though it probably wouldn't live up to H4 audio. |
|
August 14th, 2007, 07:29 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
John,
While the audio can creep over a long period of time, if you're introducing regular cuts in your edit, that should allow you plenty of opportunities to keep in sync. Now, if you're trying to keep an hour long straight through cut in sync, yeah, that might be a challenge. |
| ||||||
|
|