|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 16th, 2006, 01:21 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Albany NY
Posts: 311
|
Opinion - Matching GL-2 and Optura
Contimplating a multi camera shoot using 2 GL-2s for medium and close up shots and wondering about using an Optura, in a fixed location for a wide shot. The set will be interior, probably lit with daylight bulbs (Client wants windows to show) or if I have my way, tungsten. In either case, it should be well lit.
Do you think the Optura wide shots will mix well with the GL-2s? Last edited by Mike Cavanaugh; March 17th, 2006 at 08:39 AM. |
March 17th, 2006, 02:09 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Camera mixing
I was wondering something along those lines because my next wedding will most likely involve a GL2 and a 2nd camera. The second camera is what is up in the air and I was hoping to research a setup similar to what you mentioned.... high ends to do the heavy lifting, and a lower end to stil in the back for a wide angle shot when needed for cuts, etc.
jason |
March 17th, 2006, 12:19 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
I'm working with Mike on this project. It is an Optura 60.
|
March 17th, 2006, 01:14 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
I've never touched an Optura 60 (I do have an Optura 20, but that's a different CCD). My guess would be that you might want to crank down any detail enhancement settings that might be available on the Optura 60 (experimenting is obviously the key). If the 60 performs similarly to a 20, I think you should be able to boost saturation in post to match a GL2 pretty well without inducing a ton of grain (I'm assuming the GL2 will produce noticeably richer color saturation). If boosting saturation in post from the Optura does result in noticeably more grain than the GL2, some gentle noise reduction (spatial and temporal) could ease that a little.
|
March 17th, 2006, 11:46 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,048
|
2nd camera
This is an intersting post.
I have a digital 8 for a second camera and it is only useful if you are outside or have really good lighting indoors. I have been considering a second camera and was wondering if anyone has thought about a 3ccd panny 150, 250 or 400?? They should give better overall color and outstanding stills. of course if your spending over a grand you may as well go for a second highend camera, even if it is used, eh?? any thoughts??? Dale |
March 18th, 2006, 08:35 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
The best bang-for-the-buck 3 1/3" CCD "pro" camera I know of is the JVC GY-DV300U. They can be purchased, used, often in almost new condition, for well under $1500. I got mine for under a grand, with only 20 hours on the drum. For shooting 4:3 SD, there's no way I'd consider trading it for one of the Panasonic consumer 3 chippers.
|
March 18th, 2006, 11:20 AM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|