April 27th, 2003, 03:23 PM | #286 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 636
|
It's a good concept and it looks like the editing went fine.
The one thing that caught my eye is that the fan footage looks like it was shot handheld style and the fan circles and shakes as it twirls. That seemed pretty random. I think that a well executed tripod movement with a slow push into the fan would make it look really sharp. Then the fan would crawl in a slow, deliberate movement from the bottom left (or right) of the frame to meet the cats eye. Make it look like it was meant to be. Ben Lynn |
April 30th, 2003, 12:32 AM | #287 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Auto:Manual Focus Lock or Not!!
Apologies if this has been covered before.
After spending time with a Vid-Pro friend, and he asking me if I could "lock" MF when I power down I said I didn't know. Did a search here on our site - no show. Well nothing like direct action eh? - I tried this: 1 Switched on XM2 2 Slide to Camera/Tape 3 Selected MF 4 Switched off - MF disappeared on re-switch on - reverted to Auto focus, as expected. Okay, repeated, but this time flicked lever to "Lock". Motors and drive switch off, viewfinder goes black. Reboot XM2 - MF still in VF!! This appears to be in contradiction to XM2 manual: "If you slide POWER switch to OFF or [ this is the killer point! ] the standbay lever to LOCK, the camcorder resets to auto focus" . . . well seems like the MF viewfinder info doesn't know or hasn't read the manual! Interested? - Seems like a very useful function/feature. Means that at least the MF settings - maybe - aren't zapped. This means that I can keep the XM2 locked and OFF via the LOCK and save battery - not forgetting the less drive wear and roller stuff. Grazie |
April 30th, 2003, 01:17 AM | #288 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
Indeed, Graham, the "Lock" switch (on the GL2 and XL1s) is very handy for powering-down while preserving your settings (such as manual focus). It acts like "sleep" on a computer.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
April 30th, 2003, 01:30 AM | #289 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Ken - Perhaps someone should inform Canon Manual editor - yeah?
Thanks for the confirmation. Ken, I'm getting busy to do my Horizon/Paralax test - see other post. Chris Hurd is supporting me on this one - but your feedback would be appreciated too. Grazie |
April 30th, 2003, 01:38 AM | #290 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
Yes, I've been following it.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
May 1st, 2003, 08:16 PM | #291 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 55
|
Dubbing one chip to one chip
I've read some posts here stating that dubbing from a three chip to a one chip will not cause any loss in the quality. Would it be correct for me to assume that dubbing from a one chip cam to another one chip cam via firewire using a mini dv tape that was recorded on a three chip will still not result in any quality loss?
Thank you, Tony |
May 1st, 2003, 08:20 PM | #292 |
High School Student
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canton, Ohio, USA
Posts: 609
|
Of course it won't affect the quality. The imaging system (lens and ccd) have nothing to do with transfering the footage...
|
May 1st, 2003, 11:09 PM | #293 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lake Park, Florida
Posts: 202
|
What's the best method for recording sound during a video shoot???
Lets say you want to shoot small films or what-not. What mics are good at doing that. Are booms the best for getting what is only onscreen, so maybe you can still direct the actors but without being heard like in the movies???
Or, wireless, or good zoom mics??? |
May 1st, 2003, 11:21 PM | #294 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
Bob,
I recommend getting a copy of Jay Rose's book "Producing Great Sound for Digital Video". It provides far more practical tips and information than possible in this thread.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
May 2nd, 2003, 10:47 PM | #295 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chigasaki, Japan.
Posts: 1,660
|
Yes Tony as Alex said the lens and CCDs have nothing to do with transfering the footage from one camera to another. Footage transfered from one camera to another over firewire bypasses the imaging array and goes straight to the VCR section, you lose no quality as the footage is transfered as 1s and 0s.
__________________
Adrian DVInfo.net Search for quick answers Where to buy? From the best in the business...DVInfo.net sponsors |
May 3rd, 2003, 08:48 PM | #296 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 202
|
Optex .3x fisheye lens
Has anyone had any experience with this lens? I used to have the Raynox MX3000 fisheye and it was pretty good for skateboarding videos. I was wondering how the Optex would compare to this or the Century?
Thanks in advance |
May 4th, 2003, 02:24 PM | #297 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 116
|
The Century is a big step up from the MX3000, price and quality wise. If you are filming skateboarding videos you want to make sure your capable of taking care and using this lens. I have heard many stories of boards flying and shattering the lens. With the Century you are going to get a lot more distortion and a wider angle of view. You are also going to get a noticable gain in weight with the lens on your camera. This is the premier lens for skateboard filming and is worth every penny in my opinion, but the decision is yours.
|
May 6th, 2003, 07:28 AM | #298 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: barcelona
Posts: 4
|
DM 50 Directional Stereo Mic
Hi again,
I´m still struggling to acheive a better sound with my new GL2.. Anyone tried out the DM 50 Mic from Canon? How would it work for one-man interviews for documentaries? Are there any other manufactures to consider as well? Thanks again from Barcelona, Anna
__________________
crozzcom |
May 6th, 2003, 09:36 AM | #299 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 357
|
Viewfinder issue?
I've finally had a chance to give the new GL2 a workout and have a question/possible problem -
The viewfinder seems to be really shifted to the cool end of the spectrum. The LCD is fine, and what I have viewed on a TV is fine but the viewfinder really pushes the blues. For example, a hummingbird shot in sunlight showing a blue gorget when it should have been violet and an overall blue cast to everything in low light (but not so low as autogain kicks in). Is this normal or a defect?
__________________
Jeff Price Flickerflix Nature Videos flickerflix@yahoo.com |
May 6th, 2003, 12:34 PM | #300 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 636
|
I don't know about the blue shift but overall I'm pretty disappointed with the viewfinder as a whole.
On my camera's viewfinder the color is oversaturated and it never seems like the picture is very crisp (yes I've used the adjustment knob). Canon made a mistake by making the viewfinder color and it would have been a lot more useful if it were black and white. Ben Lynn |
| ||||||
|
|