|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 4th, 2002, 01:19 AM
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20
|
gl2 has more pixels than xl-1s?
so i'm looking at the gl-2 stats and it said it had more "effective" pixels than the xl-1s. sadly i can't look it up right now and type it here for you to see.
i bet there is something i'm not seeing and you are. what is it? |
|
|
|
December 4th, 2002, 01:36 AM
|
#2 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chigasaki, Japan.
Posts: 1,660
|
The XL1 has bigger CCDs. 1/3 against 1/4. Pixel count isn't a really accurate way of determining the performance of a CCD.
__________________
Adrian DVInfo.net Search for quick answers Where to buy? From the best in the business...DVInfo.net sponsors |
|
|
|
|
December 4th, 2002, 01:40 AM
|
#3 |
|
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
That's correct. The newer GL2 has 3 1/4" CCD's with 380,000 effective pixels. The XL1s has 1/3" CCD's with 250,000 effective pixels.
As Adrian notes, this difference is bigger in numbers than in your eye. I match XL1s and GL2 footage quite nicely with little adjustment.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
