February 18th, 2006, 10:35 AM | #391 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Canon WD58H ( H=hood ) ! PERIOD! - G
|
February 18th, 2006, 10:53 AM | #392 |
Capt. Quirk
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Middle of the woods in Georgia
Posts: 3,596
|
I agree- I bought my WD without a hood, and would really love to get my hands on one.
__________________
www.SmokeWagonLeather.us |
February 18th, 2006, 11:45 AM | #393 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,375
|
I am very happy with my Canon wide angle. (WD58H)
|
February 18th, 2006, 01:44 PM | #394 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
|
|
February 19th, 2006, 02:33 AM | #395 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Delete this profile
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Sorry Ignoor that first and last sentence ;) |
|
February 26th, 2006, 07:00 PM | #396 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Sandy |
|
February 26th, 2006, 07:29 PM | #397 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 44
|
I bought a cheapy .45 wide angle as well. It is a piece of garbage. So I ended up getting the WD58H, it is a great piece of optics for the price. Nice weight to it and a crystal clear picture.
Chris <edit> Just as a side note. The only complaint I have with the WD58H is that there are no internal threads (or external threads) to add filters to at the business end of the lense. It would be nice to add a UV filter if for nothing else other than to protect the lense from scratches and grime. |
February 27th, 2006, 01:22 AM | #398 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I use Canon WD58H's on my GL2's and don't have any complaints really. Good image, even when zoomed in. Like the previous poster mentioned you can't attach any threaded filters to the outside of this lens. I also can't imagine using it without the hood, especially outdoors.
I know A LOT of people who use this lens and love it. |
March 5th, 2006, 09:43 AM | #399 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 48
|
Wide angle lens for GL2
I've been searching for a wide angle len's for my GL2. I've found them from $70- $700. I don't need a fish eye pro len's. I just want one thats decent for indoor filming. Will there be a hude increase in quality let's say from a $100 one compared to the one Canon sell's for $250? E-bay has a ton ton of them. Like I said they have a huge price range. Some say HD blah blah blah but are they still 1/2 way good at that price?
|
March 5th, 2006, 09:46 AM | #400 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saint John, CANADA
Posts: 633
|
the wd-58 is great for what your looking for. I always had mine on my gl1
__________________
video : xl2 / letus35xl / bogen 503 photo- canon 1dmkII - bronica etrsi |
March 5th, 2006, 04:58 PM | #401 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 71
|
Is there even a slight image degradation when using a wide lens? I've there is when using filters.
|
March 5th, 2006, 05:01 PM | #402 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saint John, CANADA
Posts: 633
|
for what i was using my gl1 for i almost always had the wd-58 attatched and was always happy with the image quality
__________________
video : xl2 / letus35xl / bogen 503 photo- canon 1dmkII - bronica etrsi |
March 6th, 2006, 09:11 PM | #403 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 35
|
The potential for loss of lens resolution/sharpness is very real anytime you put more glass in front of a perfectly balanced (optically) lens. The GL2's 20x lens is superb and one of the main reason why I bought the camera. So when I decided to add a wide angle lens I went with the WD-58H.
I'am very pleased with the image quality of this lens and I love how solid it feels and enhences the look of my cammy.
__________________
Val Rod |
March 6th, 2006, 10:58 PM | #404 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey
Posts: 75
|
Major thumbs up on the wd-58. A great piece of glass. Don't buy the cheaper off brand- it isn't worth it.
__________________
"The Light is the melody, the Motion is the lyrics..." |
March 7th, 2006, 07:45 PM | #405 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,487
|
With lenses you generally get what you pay for. Cheap lenses generally give corresponding results and are really not suitable for profesional work - unlesss you are looking for a cheap lens effect.
The Century Precision Optics are top of the line, and Canon's product is also good.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
| ||||||
|
|