![]() |
#166 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 197
|
from what I've gleaned
from my research I learned that the less expensive options have a lot of image quality issues. You can get cheaper lenses but owners of GL2s prob won't be interested.The more expensive century optics lenses are quite good from what I've read but the consensus in my research essentially said the canon was the sweet spot in terms of price/quality. I have one on order myself.
__________________
on the Internet, when you get where you're going you still don't know where you are |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#167 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Waterbury, CT
Posts: 101
|
Here are my findings. I tested both the $400 Century Optics .65x and Canon WD-58H wide angle adapters side-by-side.
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...ighlight=wd58h
__________________
Dumb Guy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lake Park, Florida
Posts: 202
|
Yea, I've seen that thread before before he revised it. I guess it's pretty much the Canon's or nothing I assume. I've seen a Kenko ProWide .65x which is said to be pretty good but it's almost as much as the Canon's lens.
I'm in the buying accessories mode right now. I've gotten the Glidacam 2000 Pro, 5 DV tape, a filter kit, and I ordered a tripod. It starts adding up and I don't even have a light. I was thinking about getting the VL-10i video light because it doesn't require Canon's GL2's power source so I could move it around if I needed to. I also don't have a carrying case/hard case. Oh woo is me. It's a great camera but without accessories it's just that a camera. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Eatontown, NJ
Posts: 118
|
Canon WA better on Sony, too?
Brendan,
This question is somewhat OT, but do you have any data/opinions on whether the Canon WA has a better image than the Century on a Sony VX-2000? In other words, would your tests apply to the Sony as well? Thanks. -- Allen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Waterbury, CT
Posts: 101
|
Yes, the adapters perform identically on the Sony (they are the same adapters). Also, the Canon WD-58 performs noticeably better than the more-expensive Sony 0.7x W/A adapter as well. I have the Sony adapter with the VX2000, but no longer use it because the Canon is superior.
__________________
Dumb Guy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#171 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 80
|
I have read that the Optex anamorphic lens is better than the Century. Is it the same for the Wide angle?
It will be interesting to compare the WD-58 to the Optex to see if one is better than the other. Anyone has done this test? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#172 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,222
|
Brendan,
My Raynox 0.66 wide angle is fully zoom through, so I'm thinking about other WA lenses. I can't distinguish the Canon WD-58 from the WD-58H. Which of these two fit on a VX-2000 ? Are they fully zoom through ? Thank you . http://www.promax.com/Products/Detail/16148 http://www.digitalfotoclub.com/products2/Canon_Canon_WD-58_0_7x_Wide_Angle_f_GL1_3107a002.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#173 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 66
|
Hi Brendan,
Thanks for the info. I would like to see those screen shots! Cheers, Dirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#174 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Waterbury, CT
Posts: 101
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Gints Klimanis : My Raynox 0.66 wide angle is fully zoom through, so I'm thinking about other WA lenses. I can't distinguish the Canon WD-58 from the WD-58H. Which of these two fit on a VX-2000 ?
They are the same adapter. The "H" comes with the hood (which I believe is the only way they sell it now). Both fit the 58mm screw mount of the GL2 and VX2000 and should perform much better then the Raynox.
__________________
Dumb Guy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Interesting that Brendan thinks the OIS is seriously degraded when using a zoom through wide-angle converter. If any of you other folk think so, try this. Fit your wide-angle converter and zoom to telephoto. Handholding the combo as still as you can, toggle between OIS on and off and see if you agree with him. I don't.
Oh, maybe at the wide end it doesn't work as well as the camera on its own, but why buy a zoom through then? OK, switch off the OIS if you've bought a non zoom through w/angle, but for all other occasions leave OIS turned on. It's an amazingly transparent technology that closes in on magic. tom. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#176 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
H stands for Hood . . .
"I can't distinguish the Canon WD-58 from the WD-58H. "
D'yer know why? - there isn't - you're correct. The "H" is the model that "includes" the Sun Hood - simple as that! Cheers, Grazie |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#177 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 804
|
Tom, I agree with you. There is not a single reason why OIS would degrade if a WA is used. OIS is a angular camera motion correction system which is not influenced by a WA adapter lens.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#178 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Waterbury, CT
Posts: 101
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Andre De Clercq : Tom, I agree with you. There is not a single reason why OIS would degrade if a WA is used. OIS is a angular camera motion correction system which is not influenced by a WA adapter lens. -->>>
I'm sorry, but OIS is degraded when any adapter is added to the front -- in my experience. There is actually a very simple, viable explanation for it, but I have since forgotten it. Try it for yourself. Both the W/A and TC adapters degrade IS effectiveness.
__________________
Dumb Guy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#179 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 804
|
Brendan, can you explain what kind of degradation you did experience. Do you see other effects than motion stabilisation when OIS is on? On the effectiveness point, you should know that OIS is based on angular motion detection based on gyro sensors. The compensation degree is never 100% for the whole motion (shake) frequency spectrum, so you'll allways get some remaining motion effects or not fully compensated angles of motion. The remaining uncompensated angular components translate into image shifts which are lens focal length dependent. So tele will allways result in more shake residues than wide. WA adapters are just (together with the standard lens) optical systems with short overall focal length and don't change this compensation behavier.
B.t.w. I have VX2000 and WD-58. I never expirienced negative effects... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#180 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,487
|
The adapter may change the calibration factors for the VAP action vs. sensed motion making it less effective.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|