|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 7th, 2002, 07:58 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 408
|
Lens question
I'm looking to get a filter for the GL2. I'm interested in one that can stay on for protection, with minimal distortion.
I'm looking at the B + W 58mm filters. The choices (regular, not slim) I've been looking at so far include the following: strong UV haze 415 glass filter; UV haze 010 (MRC) Multi Resistant Coating glass filter; UV haze 010 glass filter; or UV haze 010 flass filter extra wide. Does anyone have recommendations as to which filter best meets my needs? Stephen |
November 8th, 2002, 04:02 AM | #2 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Get a slim line. It might be closer to the lense thus less reflection and distortion.
I didn't know they have so many variations of the UV 010. Maybe this one? UV haze 010 glass filter or a Heliopan UV? (slim line) But what's wrong with a Cokin or Hoya? For a UV protection filter for a video cam, you don't have to go with the most expensive. [IMG]www.dvfreak.com/filters.htm[/IMG] |
November 9th, 2002, 08:07 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 408
|
I'm not familiar with either the Cokin or the Hoya. How do they compare to the B + W or Heliopan in terms of distortion?
|
November 9th, 2002, 11:37 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cape Girardeau, MO
Posts: 38
|
I use Hoya filters for my Canon 35mm SLR and I see no distortion in my film.
I havn't tried any Cokin though. |
November 9th, 2002, 11:45 PM | #5 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
B+W and Heliopan are both owned by the same company, and both use the same German glass. No difference.
I have Cokin filters, and I like them better than the Heliopans, B+Ws, Nikons etc. I've heard that Hoya filters are also very good. Regarding specialty filters, that's more subjective and another story. |
November 10th, 2002, 07:53 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 408
|
Is there a difference in distortion/video quality between multicoated filters versus regular filters?
|
November 10th, 2002, 08:45 AM | #7 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The difference varies from nominal to extreme. Your safest bet is to always use a multi coated filter unless you can guarantee with 100% certainty your lighting conditions. Single coated filters will show varying degrees of flair the more you point your lens toward a bright light source. Single coated filters also tend not to be manufactured to the same standards as the more expensive multi coated filters. Bottom line , best investment and most bang for the buck, multi coated filters.
Jeff |
November 11th, 2002, 12:19 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 200
|
I have the multi-coated B+W and it lives on my GL2. I avoided the slimline becase it does not have threads on the external side so the lens cap would not stay on unless you by a new lens cover.
|
November 11th, 2002, 01:43 PM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
Yeah I got the slimline Heliopan UV and I have that problem with the lenscap, staying on, but the stupid clip on the cap presses up against the lens - and yeah it does mark the filter :(. Even with the non-slim Heliopan the same problem occured, so I just stuck with the slim one. I will need to get another cap, or I will put a thin layer of felt on it.
|
| ||||||
|
|