|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 13th, 2002, 06:07 AM | #16 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
I've been to that page and unfortunately I don't read that language. I question some of their methods because I can see differences in the shots (framing, shadows, color temp?) Not being able to read the captions really limits me in evaulating the validity of their tests. I don't see it running out of light far earlier. I see maybe 1/2 stop difference. But what settings are they using (gain, AE, manual, WB?).
Jeff |
October 4th, 2002, 04:41 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 61
|
to psurfer1
psurfer1
when I look at the still images on the side you refer to I can see that the sharpness and especially the DOF of the Canon is much beter than the VX2000. The low light ability is only a little bit better in the top image but not 2 stops!!!!!!! |
October 4th, 2002, 04:43 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 61
|
to psurfer1
Look in de garden with flowers, in the case of the Canon the picture is also in focus on the background!!!!
|
October 5th, 2002, 01:02 AM | #19 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Alex, I too am wondering about the GL2's resolution. It should be near the VX2000/PD150's horizontal line playback of 500 lines. I asked this question on another forum, and basically got dumped on by the moderator who wrote a GL2 review. Next week I'm going to try and track down a resolution test, or arrange a test for myself. Personally, I don't care whether it's 485 lines, 500 lines, or 510 lines. But I would like to know, nevertheless.
|
| ||||||
|
|