|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 5th, 2004, 03:25 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hungary
Posts: 462
|
Make videos more "dreamy"
I have several footage of trees, lakes, clouds, sunsets, etc..
With my friend we make a relaxation dvd, he write the music, i'm the cameraman. The videos looks good, but for this type of work is too "realistic". 720x576x50 fps interlaced, shooted with xm2, so the colors are nice and vibrant. But, if we want more "dreamy" video, what effect do you suggest in post processing? I dont want to deinterlace, because the motion is smoother with interlaced footage. Do i have to change the gamma or the levels? Add a soft focus effect? Maybe a trail shadow? What can i do (in vegas)? thank you, Marton |
August 5th, 2004, 04:58 AM | #2 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
I would first work on softening / blurring / adding glow to your
piece. Glow might work wonders. Deinterlacing would really help and really should not cause the motion to be less smooth if done correctly.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
August 5th, 2004, 05:43 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hungary
Posts: 462
|
What do you mean, correctly?
Progressive video is 25 full frame/sec, and interlaced is 50 half/sec, so i can see twice more pictures. I don't like progressiv video on TV, and yes, i even don't like the film's 24 fps. Panning isn't smooth enough. Thanks for the glowing tip. |
August 5th, 2004, 06:18 AM | #4 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Well no, you do not see twice more pictures. You see exactly as
many pictures as what you see with progressive. What you are correct about is that motion has more time available to show and thus stutter less, ofcourse this motion is at 50% resolution. If you don't like then you don't. There is a difference in the quality in which the way de-interlacing is done. I would check Vegas project settings before dismissing this option so fast, you can choose from: blend fields (default) and interpolate fields. Again, if it's not for you then by all means don't use it. Anyway, experimenting with such sequences is key to find the look you are after / are comfortable with / works for your project. Settings that I might like for my dream project might not work for yours. Good luck and fun with your experimenting!
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
August 5th, 2004, 09:24 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 636
|
I think that your options are pretty limited if you don't want to de-interlace your footage. That is probably the biggest way to make the footage feel less 'realistic'.
I think that anything that you do in post is going to leave it rather harsh. You may want to start looking into some Tiffen Soft Diffusion filters and really focus on the production end of capturing the footage. Ben Lynn |
August 6th, 2004, 02:20 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,237
|
How about the Pixelan filters? Specifically StepMotion and StepTime. $99 download and there is a demo at www.pixelan.com.
The reason I mentioned it is that there are a couple of presets called Dreamy1 and Dreamy2! Might be a bit over the top for what you are looking for but you never know. |
| ||||||
|
|