|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 14th, 2003, 06:47 AM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4
|
True 25p on XM-2 (GL2 PAL)?
Ok, so here's a discussion that has been going on on European boards for a while. It seems as if by switching the shutter speed on the XM-2 (the PAL version GL-2) to 1/25 while still in interlace mode will give you a true 25p image. To illustrate this I have these pictures online:
http://www.drachenauge.de/XM2-1-25.jpg http://www.drachenauge.de/XM2-1-50.jpg I think the difference is obvious. The problem in outdoor conditions is that you need a lot of ND filters because so much light is caught on the CCD. However, the look is great and nobody can tell me how it is technically achieved. Is this a true progressive mode? Jan |
November 14th, 2003, 08:19 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chigasaki, Japan.
Posts: 1,660
|
The 1/25 image still isn't a true progressive image but due to the slower shutter speed the blur is enough that the interlacing appears to blend almost entirely. The 1/25 image sure does look better in the still shot and you will get a nice filmic look from the video as long as there isn't any fast action in the scene.
Are those shots yours, if so I like the lighting, it's quite eyecatching.
__________________
Adrian DVInfo.net Search for quick answers Where to buy? From the best in the business...DVInfo.net sponsors |
November 14th, 2003, 08:29 AM | #3 |
Tourist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4
|
Sorry to say that the pictures are not by me but by a colleague. I don't think the blurring explanation does the job - the girls on the 1/25 frame are not blurred at all and still there are no interlace artifacts on them.
|
November 14th, 2003, 09:02 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chigasaki, Japan.
Posts: 1,660
|
It could be a result of the 25fps and the 1/25 shutter speed being equal. The bottom line is it is still interlaced which is evident from the lines in the 1/25 shot. If it was true progressive there wouldn't be any lines at all.
__________________
Adrian DVInfo.net Search for quick answers Where to buy? From the best in the business...DVInfo.net sponsors |
November 14th, 2003, 09:29 AM | #5 |
Tourist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4
|
I heard from someone else who saw these very pictures that since the only lines that exist are red it might well be an artifact of the DV compression.
|
December 21st, 2003, 05:31 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
" so here's a discussion that has been going on on European boards for a while "
Jan, what is the link to the european board ? Thanks
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
December 21st, 2003, 07:17 PM | #7 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Progressive captures 1 frame at a time; frame mode captures 2 fields at almost the same time via rapid shutter and interpolation. Progressive is "cleaner."
|
December 21st, 2003, 07:57 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England, london.
Posts: 31
|
Anyone know for sure, what settings on the XM2 will get the best "film look". i mean, shutter speed, exp, and so on?
Is it frame mode with 1/25 shutter? i supose it depends a lot on light and so on... anyone that has tested all modes, and played around on the xm2 a lot have a final thought on which gives the best look? Thanks |
December 22nd, 2003, 08:37 AM | #9 |
Tourist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Charles King :
Jan, what is the link to the european board ? Thanks -->>> The discussion I followed was in German so it probably won t be helpful to many of you but here it is: http://216.127.95.21/47332 |
December 22nd, 2003, 08:44 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Thanks Jan
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
| ||||||
|
|