Low Light Problems GL2 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon HDV and DV Camera Systems > Canon XL and GL Series DV Camcorders > Canon GL Series DV Camcorders
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Canon GL Series DV Camcorders
Canon GL2, GL1 and PAL versions XM2, XM1.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 21st, 2009, 11:28 PM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Low Light Problems GL2

I've encountered low light issues in instances of virtually unlit rooms or candlelight ceremonies. I've tried a number of manual settings and am coming up drawing a blank on what to do in extreme low light. We recently purchased professional lighting to cure some of the problem but there are those who insist on keeping the light virtually too low to record anything. We did a job this last weekend where they wanted video of the crowd but did not want any lighting. Result= noise even with manual settings.

Any suggestions on how to tweak the manual settings or should we just refuse jobs where it's virtually hard to see anything even with the naked eye?
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2009, 12:34 PM   #2
Old Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
A] Lighting

B] Gain

C] Post

D] Closeups using the Candles or any lighting you are allowed to use

E] Hire an alternative camera with a bigger than 1/4" Chip and add this hire cost to the bill! Simple! Never turn work down - if you can avoid it?

Grazie
Graham Bernard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24th, 2009, 12:55 PM   #3
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
If better lighting is out of the question:

1. Be sure the client is aware of the limitations of shooting in poor light. Show examples to manage their expectations.

2. Once you run out of stop, try a slower shutter and live with the motion artifacts.

3. Be sure not to use high amounts of zoom that result in losing lens speed.

4. Use as much gain as you feel you can get away with.

5. Use a noise removal software in post; e.g., Neat Video.

6. Look into a camcorder that can do a bit better in low light such as the VX2100/PD170.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com
Don Palomaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27th, 2009, 07:18 AM   #4
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Thank you

Thanks for the suggestions. I have tried the slower shutter but did have to change it back when people were dancing. I will try Neat Video first. Thanks again.
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27th, 2009, 06:15 PM   #5
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
A low wattage camcorder light, maybe 10 watts, can make a difference and yet not be excessively intrusive.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com
Don Palomaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29th, 2009, 12:51 AM   #6
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Palomaki View Post
A low wattage camcorder light, maybe 10 watts, can make a difference and yet not be excessively intrusive.
I do have the on-camera lighting and professional lighting and use it where it's allowed. My problem arose when I had to tape people without lighting per the customer (most of them were dancing) in a virtually unlit room while we had to zoom in for the shot and adjust manual settings which didn't work very well. We tried every adjustment possible in Premiere Pro and that didn't fix the issue either.

Neat Video looks like it will most likely fix my issues and it's reasonably priced. $49 for home users and $99 for pro users. It's compatible with Premiere Pro and a number of other editing programs.
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29th, 2009, 06:05 AM   #7
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
And NeatVideo offers a trail version to test before you buy.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com
Don Palomaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29th, 2009, 09:06 AM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Palomaki View Post
And NeatVideo offers a trail version to test before you buy.
Neat Video looks like it will help us out on some of those overlit shots too. We've shot several stage shows where the in-place house lighting was too intense.
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31st, 2009, 01:47 AM   #9
Old Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle Genrich View Post
Neat Video looks like it will help us out on some of those overlit shots too. We've shot several stage shows where the in-place house lighting was too intense.
I have NV too. How does this help your stage shot? Would you mind posting a before and after. I'd like to learn this as well.

TIA,

Grazie
Graham Bernard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2009, 08:37 AM   #10
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham Bernard View Post
I have NV too. How does this help your stage shot? Would you mind posting a before and after. I'd like to learn this as well.

TIA,

Grazie
I'm not saying it will help the "shot" itself, but if you check the Neat Video website, it appears to reduce intense light. If I post anything on before and after, it won't be for weeks yet.
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10th, 2009, 05:41 PM   #11
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Neat Video Before and After Snapshots

Finally got Neat Video up and running. Wow, what a difference.
Attached Images
  
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10th, 2009, 10:16 PM   #12
Old Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
Hi Michelle! Thanks for remembering to post and show us the before and after - great!

Might I suggest that this shot would also benefit from some careful in-Post White Balance? Do you have the facilities to accomplish this?

Grazie
Graham Bernard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11th, 2009, 07:52 AM   #13
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: S.B. Calif
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham Bernard View Post
Hi Michelle! Thanks for remembering to post and show us the before and after - great!

Might I suggest that this shot would also benefit from some careful in-Post White Balance? Do you have the facilities to accomplish this?

Grazie
Yes, I have the facilities to accomplish it. I put this one up because the contrast of the grain before using Neat Video and the result afterward. We did fix white balance in post. Thank you.
Michelle Genrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11th, 2009, 12:32 PM   #14
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Parma, Oh
Posts: 172
Don't forget to use a custom preset with your sharpness knocked down a few notches. This will help with noise tremendously.
Todd Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11th, 2009, 02:00 PM   #15
Old Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
My crude attempts at WB-ing. BTW I asked and got Michelle's agreement to do this.

Grazie
Attached Images
 
Graham Bernard is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon HDV and DV Camera Systems > Canon XL and GL Series DV Camcorders > Canon GL Series DV Camcorders


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network