|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 31st, 2005, 09:35 AM | #121 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 3,375
|
I don't know about the specifications of the MA-300 (and MA-100) so I'll leave that to someone else.
But with the MA-300 you only have the volume controls of your GL2 to play with. The Beachtek adaptors will give you more options. (and some of them provides phantom power too) |
March 31st, 2005, 11:20 AM | #122 |
Fred Retread
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,227
|
An XLR to mini adaptor will work with any battery powered mic that puts out a reasonably strong signal. Depending on the senstivity of the mic and the impedance of the mic compared to that of the camera, you may not be able to get the recording levels as high as you would prefer.
Make sure you get an adaptor that is properly wired for XLR mono to unbalanced stereo mini, or else you'll only be able to record to one channel.
__________________
"Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence..." - Calvin Coolidge "My brain is wired to want to know how other things are wired." - Me |
April 5th, 2005, 12:01 PM | #123 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 167
|
I made my own dual-XLR to mini cable (one mic to each input channel). For the money (or lack thereof), it works great for non-phantom mics or (with proper attenuation) line-level mixer feeds.
Do you have a specific mic/source in mind?
__________________
There's no way for you to know if what I'm saying is true unless you know what the truth is, and there's no way for you to know what the truth is unless there is a truth that you can know. -- Frank Peretti |
April 5th, 2005, 03:11 PM | #124 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Shokan, NY
Posts: 217
|
Yes, I wanted to boom with my AT 835B Shotgun. It is a powered mic.
I was curious if it's better to use as XLR adaptor to mini stereo or mono? Is it better to record the XLR mono signal on the two channels or one? Another thought...is it possible to use the boom on one channel and the camera mic on the second channel to later mix in for ambient?? Never claimed to be a sound recordist but I may have to do this for a short scene next week. Many thanks. |
April 5th, 2005, 03:36 PM | #125 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 167
|
One channel should be fine. You can send it to both left and right once you get it into your editor. (In Premiere, it's called "Duplicate Left" or "Duplicate Right," depending on which you had it plugged into.)
Unfortunately, you can not use the internal mic and an external one at the same time. If you want ambient sound, you'll have to set up a second mic just for that purpose and run it into the other channel. With this setup, you should have the ability to mix them in post. Be careful when shopping for "stereo" cables with one XLR jack. Just make sure it's for a balanced XLR and not a stereo XLR. There have been previous posts here concerning those.
__________________
There's no way for you to know if what I'm saying is true unless you know what the truth is, and there's no way for you to know what the truth is unless there is a truth that you can know. -- Frank Peretti |
April 5th, 2005, 04:51 PM | #126 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Shokan, NY
Posts: 217
|
I'll look through my adaptors and see what I may need. Thanks for the good advice.
|
April 5th, 2005, 05:03 PM | #127 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 331
|
Recommend BeachTek DXA-4P
Jim,
IMO the BeachTek DXA-4P is the best value. It goes for about $150-160 new and you can get used ones anywhere from $80-$120. Shows up on eBay regularly. I actually bought mine used for $55. :-) Click the link for more details. It bolts to the bottom of the GL2 and becomes "like one unit". The BeachTek bottom then can be mounted to a standard tripod. BeachTek is recommended by many DVInfo.net members. It's rugged, gives you both line and mic input, and both 1/8-in minijack and XLR inputs. I've used one for a year now and never had a problem. Don't know of anyone that ever had a problem. With regards to recording from one mic to both L & R channels -- I highly recommend it: (1) If you only record to one channel it can make for an unbalance problem with the GL2 audio circuit. (2) By recording both channels, you can set the level on one channel based on expected sounds, and then set the other channel about 7-10 db lower. This gives you some pad in case of an unexpected loud sound (laughing, sneezing, yelling, etc.). You can then select the best audio track in post that you want to use. |
April 14th, 2005, 08:13 AM | #128 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 20
|
I just got this converter for my sennheiser me/66 and GL2.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=154878&is=REG Its balanced xlr to stereo mini and seems to deliver a high quality. Of course I use battery power for my mic. Phantom power does deliver a bit higher quality but the difference is miniscule. If you can use battery power and don't have the $150 budget for the beachtek or MA-300, I reccomend this.
__________________
Come visit my website! Colorado Springs Wedding Videographer: http://www.foreverendeavor.net |
June 30th, 2005, 09:19 AM | #129 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 33
|
A quick question about the beachtek adapter. To record to both channels do you simply flip the switch to stereo then make the level adjustments with the DXA-4P? If it is more complicated than this could you possibly explain Pete?
thanx |
June 30th, 2005, 10:29 AM | #130 |
Fred Retread
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,227
|
That's correct except you actually may need to set the switch to "mono" to get a single mono mic routed to both channels. I seem to recall that the labeling of the correct choice of switch position is counter-intuitive.
Start with the GL2's own level controls set at mid range and the Beachtek's at maximum. If you need to increase the signal, use the GL2 controls. If you need to reduce the signal use the Beachtek controls, because the alternative of turning the GL2's level controls way down to get an acceptable recording level will set you up for clipping of the audio at the input. The GL2's level meters monitor recording level, not input level.
__________________
"Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence..." - Calvin Coolidge "My brain is wired to want to know how other things are wired." - Me |
June 30th, 2005, 12:22 PM | #131 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 331
|
Recording One Mic with the BeachTek
Tague,
To record the signal from one mic to both channels:
I have always adjusted the input level using the GL2 audio level controls with the BeachTek set to maximum. To the best of my knowledge, the GL2 audio level controls adjust the INPUT signal that will be recorded. Here's a quote from the BeachTek DXA-4 manual: Quote:
Quote:
Best Regards, Pete |
||
June 30th, 2005, 01:26 PM | #132 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 167
|
Pete,
I think Fred was getting at the fact that it is possible to have a signal so loud that the GL2's preamps distort. When the signal enters the camera, it goes to the preamps, and THEN to the input controls. Turning it down just reduces the level of the already-clipped signal. It may look OK on the VU meters, but it's still distorting. I made this mistake myself... once. Turning the signal down at the Beachtek box or with the attenuator would keep it in range for the preamps. The best method to avoid this problem (in my opinion) is to always monitor via headphones at the camera. If it's clipping, you'll hear it.
__________________
There's no way for you to know if what I'm saying is true unless you know what the truth is, and there's no way for you to know what the truth is unless there is a truth that you can know. -- Frank Peretti |
November 12th, 2005, 10:36 PM | #133 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 23
|
Question about XLR
Since the GL2 does not come with built-in XLR ports, you can drop an extra $200 or so on the MA-300 accessory shoe. But what about having a cable that converts 1/8" to XLR? Would it make a significant difference in quality? I found http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ist&sku=233892 to be an alternative, but I'm not sure if it should be considered.
|
November 13th, 2005, 01:06 AM | #134 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 142
|
That kind of adapter will make you lose the noise protection provided by the balanced signal on the XLR cable. It simply takes the 2 parts of the balanced signals and sends them to the left and right channels. A proper adapter will subtract the two signals, eliminating the noise, before sending it into your camera.
Not much point using XLR if you don't use the differential signal... |
November 13th, 2005, 02:21 AM | #135 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 277
|
The point in using XLR is that you already have the equipment. Yes, it will be noisier, but the average to above-average person will never notice. I mean, most people's home systems are so sh*tty that they wouldn't know the difference between an XLR and the 1/8 minijack.
Even if you're going to film,. theaters are so unpleasant these days, with badly focused film and cell phones going off left and right, that a tiny hiss that's below the aural comprehension of most humans is a nonstarter. I use a simple Radio Shack adapter to convert XLR to 14 inch and then to mini for my GL2. DJ |
| ||||||
|
|