|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 14th, 2010, 03:23 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,409
|
Hey, what's a good wide angle for the 5D?
Simple question
What's a good wide angle for the 5D. I have been looking at the 28mm f2.8 It's selling here in Oz for around the $315 mark I'm not sure on DSLR wide lenses and need some guidance. Cheers |
October 14th, 2010, 07:56 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
14mm is awesome, 15mm is nice and sharp, but it's fish eye, and I love 16-35mm
__________________
I love this place! |
October 14th, 2010, 08:32 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 414
|
The 16-35mm almost never comes off my boss' camera (which means I'm left to cover medium and telephoto angles most of the time). He loves it as wide as it goes, and I can see why - it makes a pretty great image...
|
October 14th, 2010, 01:20 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,082
|
I love the Sigma 20mm f/1.8.
|
October 14th, 2010, 03:05 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I use my ancient pre-AI Nikkors. The 24mm is my wide angle. So far I haven't needed anything wider. I do have a Tamron 17-35 but I haven't used it.
|
October 14th, 2010, 06:46 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwegian lost in California
Posts: 890
|
I second the 16-35mm recommendations -- next to my 70-200mm, it's the lens I've used the most on the 5d2.
-- peer
__________________
www.NoPEER.com |
October 15th, 2010, 05:57 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 176
|
Sigma EF DG 17 - 35mm F2.8
I use this lens - got it really cheap on the Bay. I love it. Takes great photos too.
|
October 15th, 2010, 06:11 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
Quote:
The Canon 14mm is a special lens, though I'd categorize it as super-wide. The Canon 16-35mm is also excellent, but my favorite wide lens for the 5D is the Canon 24mm f/1.4 - it aint cheap though! |
|
October 15th, 2010, 09:29 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 36
|
I will also add my vote for the Canon 16-35mm F2.8 L.
|
October 15th, 2010, 09:56 AM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,589
|
I'm a prime-lens fan, especially the pro-level Nikkors, Pentax A*, and Canon 'L' series...but I have also come to love some older professional-grade zooms, especially the wides, such as the legendary Nikon Nikkor 20-35mm f/2.8 D which is one of my favourites.
My most-used wide-angle zoom lens on the 5D Mark II is the Canon L 17-35mm f/2.8 zoom. Used corrrectly it can be a fantastic tool in your wide-angle armoury. I've use it extensively for everything filmed from land, air and underwater; and it is also very good for normal stills photography. The newer and more expensive 16-35mm f/2.8 L is also a very nice lens to use, although I found it only very slightly sharper at extreme corners compared to the 17-35mm, but the 17-35mm f/2.8 L matched it for sharpness in centre and right out to the four powerpoints of the frame (which to me is the most important aspects in photography and filming). |
October 15th, 2010, 01:43 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwegian lost in California
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
-- peer
__________________
www.NoPEER.com |
|
October 15th, 2010, 02:10 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,409
|
Thanks for the advice guys. The Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L looks great and I have been looking at this but it carries a heavy price attached with it. I might dig around some second hand shops, Ebay etc... and see what I can find.
Cheers |
October 16th, 2010, 07:04 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
I will also chime in for the Canon 17-40 F4 L. It sells for half of the price new that the 16-35 F2.8 L sells for, is pretty much the same sharpness, it is slower, but it is half of the cost also. The 16-35 is a better lens but for video, I think is overpriced. It is also heavy and large whereas the 17-40 is not at all heavy or large.
For used glass, check out Buy & Sell New & Used Cameras ? Canon, Nikon, Hasselblad, Leica & More - KEH.com I have bought many used lenses and bodies from them, they are great. Their grading system is very accurate and they ship you what they say they are going to as far as the items condition. Lenses, as long as they have been taken care of, are one of the few items I always buy used now, you save so much over brand new glass. I won't typically buy used digital cameras but lenses work out great when I buy used. Dan Brockett |
October 16th, 2010, 08:24 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Personally, my favorite is the 24mm f/1.4 L II, but the Sigma 24mm f/1.8 is much more inexpensive.
|
October 16th, 2010, 10:26 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 218
|
Definitely 24 1.4. I do not like the look of the 16-35 at all. Not just the distortion but just the odd dull/oversharpened look it has.
And right now there's a piece of plastic with numbers in my hand telling me to pick up the 14mm rectilinear.
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II || L-Series Lenses || Steadicam Pilot || Final Cut Studio www.lovestorymedia.com |
| ||||||
|
|